Patek Philippe Forum Rules and Etiquette Guide

WPS member · Patek Philippe forum

30 replies11071 views3 photos

Miranda's post outlines the stringent rules and etiquette for the Patek Philippe forum, emphasizing a commitment to quality, evidence-based discussion over mere opinion. This foundational post serves to maintain a respectful and informative environment, setting clear expectations for contributors. It highlights the moderator's dedication to fostering substantive engagement within the community.

30 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

Here are the rules:

1. Break the rules you get banned- no warning ⚠️

I want quality of discussion not quantity

E.g.

A blanket statement, no fact or evidence or statistics

I gave the OP a chance:

www.watchprosite.com

I produce facts, still waiting to hear a response.... gone quiet 🤫

Statement without fact=instant ban

2. Discussion can be had and opinions given when provided with a review

Eg if you compare a AP Royal Oak Jumbo v Patek 5711 with good pictures, statistics etc and come to a conclusion that the Royal Oak is a better watch, then that's a valid point of view

Just making a statement like : the Nautilus is crap the Royal Oak is better finished : with no evidence=Instant ban

3. You don’t have to like Patek Philippe. You don’t have to spend your hard earned money on one. You can detest them infact: but you don’t disrespect the brand and its collectors here: instant ban if you do

4. As per 3: but applies to all other brands- don’t come here and say PP are great but AP or ALS or anyone including Timex are crap

5. Watch reviews comparing watches with pictures, facts etc most definitely welcome

6. Comparing different Patek’s of all era welcome: if you think a cal 12’120” is better than a cal 215 and wish to show off your lovely piece, please do

7. Respect for others: not negotiable- any disrespect=instant ban

So statement like this:

Without back up evidence=ban

Btw: Patek facilities at Fluckiger make the dials for other manufacturers too....

Please demonstrate the unorganised mess or guess what- BAN

Have a great 👍🏻 day

Imran

About the Patek Philippe Complications Ref. 5711

The Patek Philippe Complications reference 5711/1A is a specific configuration within the Complications model line. This particular reference is identified by its serial number 5914840, with a movement number 6084863.

The watch is presented in a stainless steel case, indicated by the "/1A" suffix. No specific details regarding the crystal material or movement architecture are provided.

This reference appeals to collectors seeking a Patek Philippe Complications model in stainless steel. Its specific serial and movement numbers are documented for identification purposes.

Specifications

Caliber: 26-330 S C

Case: Stainless steel

Diameter: 40mm

Dial: Blue, White

Water Resist.: 120m

Crystal: Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Moderating the Patek Philippe forum is uniquely challenging due to the strong opinions and potential for negativity, often from individuals who lack direct experience with the brand or its manufacture.
While supporting freedom of speech, it's crucial to distinguish between personal opinions and unsubstantiated, potentially hurtful statements that add no value to the forum.
The moderator argues that 'freedom of speech' does not justify derogatory or baseless statements about brands or their owners, questioning what such comments contribute to a watch forum.
Some 'facts' about watch manufacturing processes, especially regarding finishing techniques, are difficult to document with photographic evidence as many factories are closed to photography, making it challenging to provide proof in debates.
The community generally respects the moderators' efforts but questions whether outright banning is always the appropriate response, suggesting that correcting unsubstantiated claims might be preferable if the discussion remains about watches.
The moderator emphasizes that opinions without factual basis are 'worthless' and compares it to accepting a doctor's opinion without evidence, illustrating the need for substantiated claims.

The Discussion

Spangles - Dr. Tabby

Oct 30, 2018

Please don't ban me!

Hi Imran, I appreciate your deeply felt posts about Patek and your desire for quality discourse about PP. Certainly, having challenging (yet civil) conversations is stimulating and it can be good to challenge quick opinions. But, please don't be so quick to ban people! Just to help save purists from a ban, I will defend mohammad's post, not really the tone, but the idea, if considered objectively. We have had a number of great and very helpful purists such as Patrick_y and yourself post pictures

ImranLondon

Oct 30, 2018

You hit the nail on the head “the tone of the post i can't defend,”

Had it been a reasoned response with evidence and civil: no problem A statement that says Such bad finishing- quantify it Or quoting high price: when the Patek is cheaper That’s the problem Ive put up with it for too long. So extreme measures needed Opinion without fact is just worthless Would you accept your Dr opinion if it wasn’t evidence based? A few months ago, somehow a Brexit conversation went haywire A guy actually said this “You muslims all need to get out of our country, you’re all sym

Spangles - Dr. Tabby

Oct 30, 2018

Ha, okay, I see your point! [nt]

pv45

Oct 31, 2018

A bit excessive and dictatorial for a watch forum?

This is a "luxury hobby" for want of a better word. Not a visit to the Doctor or some political crisis debate. Not sure such heavy handedness is really required.

ImranLondon

Oct 31, 2018

See my response to redcoral below

All Breguet is , is a tarted up cheap lemania Panerai movement are crap they keep breaking down Vacheron overseas is a Royal oak wannabe that doesn’t sell All Richard mille are ugly overpriced crap for rich people with too much money Royal Oak offshore is bling for rappers basketball baseball America football players Is this freedom of speech? You could argue there is even an element of truth in all of the above statements But, how would you feel if you own one of those watches? What does it bri

mohammad

Oct 31, 2018

Agree .Dictatorial

Imagine you get banned for sharing opinions .