Review
Nicolas (amanico) shares his initial impressions of the 2014 Omega Seamaster 300 after seeing it in person, addressing common questions about its proportions and dial aesthetics. His review highlights key design choices and invites community discussion on this modern reinterpretation of a classic dive watch.
I finally managed to see it in the flesh, today and I could find some answers to my questions.
First of all, when I saw the first official pictures, I was positively impressed.
But you know the story... It is one thing to see a Watch in picture, it is another thing to see it in the flesh.
I had, in fact, two questions.
1/ The proportions. Not the size, but the thickness.
In the real, the Watch is not that thick. So, good point.
2/ The wording.
Here, my feelings didn't change. I regret having to read " Master Co Axial " on the dial. That made me think about the excessive wording on cars from the Eighties " GTI 16V Turbo Sport GT... ".
Was it really necessary to mention that?
I would much have preferred reading Seamaster 300 at the same place.
3/ The bezel. Very nice, and warm. Still I regret the round luminous dot at twelve. A " 60 " would have been better, instead.
Nonetheless, the texture of the dial, the artificial patina, the hands and the case with these splendid lugs contribute to make of this Watch a very desirable offer.
Pretty cool, and certainly one of the good Watch from 2014.
Best,
Nicolas
The Seamaster 300 reference is a re-edition that draws inspiration from Omega's historical dive watches. It is characterized by its robust construction and design elements that pay homage to early professional timepieces, while incorporating modern watchmaking advancements. This reference is positioned as a contemporary interpretation for enthusiasts who appreciate vintage aesthetics combined with current performance standards.
This particular Seamaster 300 features a stainless steel case, typically measuring 41 mm in diameter. It is equipped with an automatic movement, often a Master Co-Axial caliber, providing a substantial power reserve. The watch is fitted with a domed sapphire crystal, contributing to its vintage appearance while offering enhanced scratch resistance. Its construction ensures a high degree of water resistance suitable for aquatic activities.
For collectors, this reference appeals to those seeking a blend of historical design and modern technical specifications. It represents Omega's commitment to its heritage while offering a reliable and well-engineered timepiece. The Seamaster 300 is a significant part of the brand's contemporary collection, offering a distinct alternative to other models within the Seamaster family.
As you stated. looking at a picture and holding the same watch in metal can't be two different views: 1.) Good to know that it's not a boat anchor - not too thick. 2.) Seamaster 300 would have been ideal. No need for all the other verbiage. 3.) Maybe better if the luminous dot over 12 was the same proportions as the zeros around the bezel. Go figure, after 5 decades of lovin' these things, now you have me designing them ;-)
. . . whether on Andrew's wrist (above), or mine . . . . . . the SM300 is within tolerable limits for the wrist-challenged. :-)
Nicolas, I agree with all of your observations except about te wording. It has less wording that the classic "superlative ...", four lines. You didn't mention the bracelet, what do you think about it? Cheers, Nilo
A pretty good Watch, my friend. Very welll done, Omega. As for the 4 lines on the vintage, well, I only see the Omega name and Logo, the world Automatic, then at the bottom, Seamaster 300. Honestly, if we are a bit inot Omega watches, we know that their movement is co axial. It was not necessary to write it. But this is not a good reason to not buy the Watch... ;) Best, Nicolas
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 23 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
