Omega Seamaster 1948 Platinum: Vintage Review

amanico · 2022-03-13T17:53:24Z

Explore the Omega Seamaster 1948 platinum limited editions. Nicolas (amanico) reviews the Small Seconds vs. Central Seconds, discussing value, design, and collector sentiment.

amanico

WPS member · Omega forum

22 replies4120 views9 photos

Nicolas (amanico) delves into the Omega Seamaster 1948 platinum limited editions, exploring whether these 70th-anniversary models justify their significant premium over their steel counterparts. His detailed comparison of the Small Seconds and Central Seconds variants, complete with high-quality imagery, invites collectors to consider the aesthetic and value propositions of these luxury interpretations. This article is essential for understanding the nuances of Omega's high-end commemorative pieces and the collector sentiment surrounding them.

22 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

Small Seconds or Central Seconds, there are two flavors for the Seamaster 1948.

Which is exactly the same choice for the steel versions.

As you can or will see, the main difference is, of course, the weight of platinum case and the color of the indices and hands, in yellow gold for the Small Seconds, in rose gold for the Central Seconds.

The Small Seconds:

The Central Seconds.

If I prefer the leaf hands of the Small Seconds for their shape and length, I must admit that I much prefer the chromatic combination of the rose gold indices and hands of the Central Seconds.

In both cases, you will notice the discreet ( but not mandatory, at least in my opinion ) PT 950 above or under the axis of the hands.

And both are limited to 70 pieces, at Omega wanted to celebrate the 70th anniversary of this reference in 2018.

One month ago, I posted a review on the Seamaster 300 platinum and yellow gold, which commanded a " heavy " extra price.

The same goes for these 2 platinum versions. And to me, at least, it is hard to justify the extra 38, 000 Euros required for them. While the steel versions are fairly priced.

Hence my title and my question. A good bad idea?

And while we are at it, the steel and the platinum versions have a specially decorated see-through case back, which is not really my taste. A solid or a more sober see-through case back would have been better, I think.

What are your feelings, here?

Best,

Nicolas

About the Omega Ref. Seamaster300

The Seamaster 300 reference is a re-edition that draws inspiration from Omega's historical dive watches. It is characterized by its robust construction and design elements that pay homage to early professional timepieces, while incorporating modern watchmaking advancements. This reference is positioned as a contemporary interpretation for enthusiasts who appreciate vintage aesthetics combined with current performance standards.

This particular Seamaster 300 features a stainless steel case, typically measuring 41 mm in diameter. It is equipped with an automatic movement, often a Master Co-Axial caliber, providing a substantial power reserve. The watch is fitted with a domed sapphire crystal, contributing to its vintage appearance while offering enhanced scratch resistance. Its construction ensures a high degree of water resistance suitable for aquatic activities.

For collectors, this reference appeals to those seeking a blend of historical design and modern technical specifications. It represents Omega's commitment to its heritage while offering a reliable and well-engineered timepiece. The Seamaster 300 is a significant part of the brand's contemporary collection, offering a distinct alternative to other models within the Seamaster family.

Specifications

Caliber: Omega 8400

Case: Stainless steel

Diameter: 41 mm

Dial: Black

Water Resist.: 300m

Crystal: Domed sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

The 'PT950' marking on the dial and the elaborate decoration on the see-through case back are considered significant drawbacks for a platinum watch, which ideally should embody 'stealth luxury.'
The preference for a solid or more understated case back is a common sentiment among collectors who value the discreet nature of platinum timepieces.
The price point of the platinum Seamaster 1948 is a major point of contention, with some contributors suggesting that other high-complication platinum watches from prestigious brands were available for less in previous years.
The rose gold indices and hands of the Central Seconds version are generally preferred for adding warmth and a more 'handsome' aesthetic, despite the Small Seconds' leaf hands being considered more elegant in shape.
The inclusion of 'PT950' on the dial is a recurring point of disagreement, as many collectors believe platinum watches should maintain a 'stealth' profile without overt material indications.
Despite the high price, some collectors would still consider acquiring the Central Seconds variant, indicating a strong aesthetic appeal for certain individuals.
The consensus among several contributors is that the platinum versions are significantly overpriced compared to their steel counterparts, making them a 'bad idea' from a value perspective.

The Discussion

Chronometer (aka yacomino)

Mar 13, 2022

Aesthetically a good idea but commercially a bad one! I love both of these watch and the steel version small second is tempting me to be honest but I keep thinking they will a remake of these maybe this year or next year…

That said the premium for platinum here is way too much and not justified IMHO…

amanico

Mar 13, 2022

I am not sure they will revisit it, as it was unveiled some 4 years ago. It is a bit too short for revisiting them. As for the premium for platinum is exaggerated, IMO...

Chronometer (aka yacomino)

Mar 13, 2022

I also wish the SS version would be non-limited

amanico

Mar 13, 2022

Same for me, by far.

AuHavrePro

Mar 13, 2022

The central seconds, with the rose gold indices and hands....

is to me a tangibly more 'handsome' combination, although I agree with you that the more elongated, elegant hand design on the YG small second version is simply prettier looking. Thanks for the pictures, Filip

amanico

Mar 13, 2022

Here again we are on the same boat. ;)