Review
Montblanc Heritage Chronometrie Ultra Slim, 38mm, in steel; ref. 112515 A few thoughts on the Chronometrie Ultra Slim might be in order. (Here's mine, wishing all of you a pleasant day!) I've just had a good time reading through comments on this watch made over the past few months, and wish to weigh
The Heritage Chronométrie Ultra Slim, reference 112515, is a notable offering within Montblanc's Heritage Chronométrie collection, distinguished by its focus on slender proportions and classic design. This particular reference emphasizes a minimalist aesthetic, appealing to collectors who value understated elegance and traditional watchmaking principles. Its design prioritizes legibility and a refined profile, making it a versatile piece suitable for various occasions. The watch reflects Montblanc's commitment to accessible high-quality watchmaking, drawing inspiration from historical Minerva designs.
This reference features a 38mm case crafted from stainless steel, contributing to its slim profile and comfortable wear. It houses a mechanical movement, known for its reliability and thin construction, which allows for the watch's svelte dimensions. The dial is protected by a sapphire crystal, ensuring durability and clear viewing. The movement provides a practical power reserve, aligning with the expectations for a daily wear timepiece. The overall construction emphasizes a balance between robustness and refined finishing.
For collectors, the Heritage Chronométrie Ultra Slim 112515 represents an entry point into Montblanc's more traditional watchmaking lineage, distinct from its sportier or more complicated offerings. Its appeal lies in its adherence to classic dress watch conventions, making it a strong candidate for those seeking a discreet yet well-executed timepiece. The discussion around its hand design highlights the attention to detail among enthusiasts, underscoring its place in collector discourse.
You see the striping... In a differet light... Less reflection. I'm afraid my photographic skills/equipment are really not up to the task!
I must say I see nothing wrong with the hands; everything looks perfect to me. Regards Kev.
Just ran across this example of hands which, by contrast, make no sense to me (Chopard L.U.C. 1937). Not sure what I would have done, but I think you'll see what I mean. Makes my point more eloquently than I ever could. (A picture is worth a thousand words.) Apologies to whomever is responsible for the clear photo—stolen from the Internet. FH
Being one of the owners and possibly reviewers you referred to, I have to say it’s certainly a watch I very much enjoy. The hands - yes, following the classical aesthetic they could be longer but do not bother me. The thinness is certainly an asset. As for the strap, nice for the watch / price level but possibly not the best I have had. But their straps generally are nice and the choices offered are pretty wide, with reasonable turn-around on custom pieces (many seem to get made in Portugal thes
Thanks much, KM. And since you commented on the strap I might as well learn something. What, precisely, were you referring to when you said, "...not the best I've had."? In my (admittedly limited) experience, companies—if someone there is thinking—seem to select straps that pair well with the basic aesthetic of the watch they're mating them with. For example, my Ball Red Label Chronometer's alligator strap is much heavier than the Chronometrie's but still supple. It doesn't crease easily. It see
And is very nice at this price level - no qualms there. I cannot comment on the Ball one, since I don't own any of their watches and GS - well the straps are not their strongest suit - I carry mine on aftermarket straps instead. There are many facets that go into a strap choice and quite some - like with watches - are highly personal. Still haven't changed the strap on my Heritage Chronometrie Ultra Slim, so definitely not saying it's bad
This thread is active on the Montblanc forum with 13 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
