Montblanc 1858 Split Second Bronze SIHH 2019 Review
Review

Montblanc 1858 Split Second Bronze SIHH 2019 Review

By amanico · Mar 11, 2019 · 27 replies
amanico
WPS member · Montblanc forum
27 replies8416 views14 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Amanico's review from SIHH 2019 highlights the Montblanc 1858 Split Second Bronze as a standout piece, placing it among other horological marvels of the exhibition. His detailed observations provide valuable insights into why this particular chronograph, with its impressive Minerva movement, captured his attention and that of the wider watch community. This article synthesizes community reactions to Montblanc's bold choice of bronze for such a high complication.

27 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

At the SIHH, this year, there were a few watches which deeply impressed me: The Jaeger-Lecoultre Gyrotourbillon 5, the Girard Perregaux La Esmeralda in white gold, the Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Twinbeat and... This Montblanc 1858 Split Second! 

Let's say it straight, Montblanc did it again, after the 1858 Tachymeter from 2016, and the Montblanc 13.21 Green from 2018.

1858 Tachymeter, 2016, in steel or in rose gold: 



The " Green " from 2018, Cal 13.21:


This year, Montblanc unveiled the king of Chronographs, a Rattrapante ( Split Second ) and a fine one! 


If automatic Split Seconds can be found here and there, there are only a few brands which launched a manual winding one. Patek, Lange, Glashutte and Richard Mille come to mind, Lange being the milestone of the category with a double ( seconds / minutes ), then a triple split ( seconds, minutes and hours ) last year. 

The challenge that Montblanc achieved here is that the released a FINE Rattrapante, with a superbly finished movement, at a very fair price ( 32, 500 Euros, yes, you read correctly, I had to ask to two different people from Montblanc to get the price confirmed ).

Let's see this new 1858 Split Second in the details: 

1/ The movement, the true star of the watch. 

The Cal 16.31


The Calibre 16.31 seems to be the well known 16.29 in which Montblanc added a superb Rattrapante mechanism. When you compare the 16.29 and the 16.31, they are very close to each other, the big difference being the characteristic double pliers and double column wheel  of the split second. 

The visual outcome is even more sculptural than the " show " offered by the 16.29. And this is also due to the high level of finishings of the parts with all the traditional elements such as perlage, anglage, Côtes de Genève, mirror polish of some parts, and even this famous " Devil's Tail ( in fact a chronograph break lever ) here hidden under one of the pliers. 

Let's not forget the huge balance wheel which is 14, 5 mm big, assuming that it is based on the 16.29. 


The diameter of the Cal 16.31 is the same than the 16.29: 38, 4 mm, but a bit thicker, due to the extra parts of the Rattrapante: 8, 13 mm high, instead of 6.30 mm. The power reserve is the same, with an autonomy of 50 hours, and it beats at the same pace ( 18, 000 vibrations per hour ).

2/ The bronze case: You should avoid quick thoughts on the diameter of the case. It is 44 mm big, 14, 5 mm high. But in the metal I thought I was playing with a 42 mm watch.

It " feels " smaller than the 1858 Tachymeter, despite its identical diameter. Strange... 


Still, it is thick, that's a fact. And even 1 mm thicker than the 1858 Tachymeter from 2016. 

These proportion certainly have to be put in relation with the dimensions of the movement.

The case is made in an alloy of titanium and bronze, and I've been told by Montblanc that it will age in a brownish color rather than the greenish we see on some other bronze watches such as the Panerai and the Tudor, to mention a few of them. 

A good point, compared to the 1858 Tachymeter from 2016, the lugs are generously beveled, which is a detail which clearly misses on mine. 


A not too good point, the bezel is a bit big for my taste. Still, not a deal breaker. 


There are two pushers: One is on the side case at 2 o' clock, which is used for the Rattrapante, and one in the crown, which activates, stops and resets to zero the chronograph. 

3/ The dial: A now classic from the 1858 Collection. 

Good or bad? This dial is well known for some years, now. We saw it on the 1858 Chronographs, manual or automatic, with a difference, here, the Snail Tachymetric Scale, in addition to the regular Telemeter located on the outer part of the dial.

The 1858 Split Seconds has a deep black dial, contrasting with the écru hour markers, red seconds, the white tachymetric scale and the gilt telemeter and hands.


Busy, yes, but not lacking charm nor character, and linked to some chronographs from the 30's and 40's. 



Protecting the dial, a lovely slightly domed sapphire glass. 

So, disappointing or bewitching, this Rattrapante? 

To tell you all, if it would have come in titanium only, or in steel, I would have already jumped on it. 

I have the feeling, when I see the Montblanc strategy, that, maybe, in the two next years, we will have such a case for that Rattrapante. So, I prefer to wait.. Unless I have the guarantee that Montblanc will only make a " one shot " in bronze. In this case, I will go for it, without any hesitation. 

I dream about a Rattrapante, and here I have a fine one. Not everything is perfect, especially the bezel and case thickness, but we are close to an excellent watch, with a lot of charm and a superlative movement. The whole thing at a bargain! 

Looking forward to reading your comments and thoughts, 

Best.

Nicolas

About the Montblanc 1858 Collection Ref. 1858

The Rolex Bubble Back, reference 1858, represents an early example of Rolex's self-winding waterproof wristwatches. This reference is part of the broader Bubble Back family, characterized by its distinctive domed case back designed to accommodate the thicker automatic movement of the era. It showcases Rolex's foundational efforts in developing robust and reliable automatic timepieces for everyday wear, laying groundwork for future Oyster Perpetual models.

This particular reference features an 18k white gold case, measuring 38mm in diameter. It is fitted with a sapphire crystal, protecting a silver dial. The watch is powered by an automatic movement, specifically the Boucheron 1858 caliber, offering a power reserve of 42 hours. The fixed bezel and leather strap complete the watch's classic presentation.

For collectors, the reference 1858 holds interest as an early and relatively rare iteration within the Bubble Back series, especially in white gold. Its larger case size for the period also makes it appealing to modern tastes. The presence of a date complication adds to its functionality, distinguishing it from simpler time-only Bubble Back models and highlighting Rolex's early integration of practical features.

Specifications

Caliber
Boucheron 1858
Case
18k white gold
Diameter
38mm
Dial
Silver
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
ZE
ZeroHour
Mar 11, 2019

This watch is close to perfect, and at this price a no brainer! Sincerely and Respectfully Joseph

GE
Gelato Monster
Mar 11, 2019

Do you think it will have good manufacturing standard and reliable vs problematic like the 1858 Tach?

TH
TheMadDruid
Mar 11, 2019

They’re doing amazing things with their chronographs. Maybe it feels smaller than its true size because you are used to a big chronograph (1858) and you probably expected a rattrapante to be bigger. Anyway, this should be the split for you.

BR
Bruno.M1
Mar 11, 2019

is good for fun watches (Tudor, some IWC and heck even the overpriced Panerai) But when looking at a fantastic movement and even a split second, the grail among chronographs.... I think bronze is a mediocre material and for me not good enough I would demand gold or platinum... and even consider simple steel... but please no bronze

MA
Makilla
Mar 11, 2019

i think it would look great in a steel or preferably a titanium case instead. As Bruno mentioned bronze is more of a fun watch and not for this kind of movement/complication. Reason why it feels smaller than 44mm is due to the busy dial and Internal subdials. These definitely affect the visual aspect of the watch and make it look smaller. Also bronze being a yellow metal blends in once strapped on the wrist and also feels smaller. As for the movement, it is definitely a marvel. Would love to win

JL
jleno
Mar 11, 2019

And incredible value for a split seconds chrono as well. Perhaps this qualifies as the ultimate "stealth bomber" watch?

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Montblanc forum with 27 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →