
amanico introduces the Montblanc 1858 Monopusher Chronograph Tachymeter in its steel version, drawing inspiration from Minerva's rich heritage. This post provides a detailed first look, comparing the new model to vintage chronographs from the 1930s and 40s, and setting the stage for a deeper discussion on its design and horological significance.
The Rolex Bubble Back, reference 1858, represents an early example of Rolex's self-winding waterproof wristwatches. This reference is part of the broader Bubble Back family, characterized by its distinctive domed case back designed to accommodate the thicker automatic movement of the era. It showcases Rolex's foundational efforts in developing robust and reliable automatic timepieces for everyday wear, laying groundwork for future Oyster Perpetual models.
This particular reference features an 18k white gold case, measuring 38mm in diameter. It is fitted with a sapphire crystal, protecting a silver dial. The watch is powered by an automatic movement, specifically the Boucheron 1858 caliber, offering a power reserve of 42 hours. The fixed bezel and leather strap complete the watch's classic presentation.
For collectors, the reference 1858 holds interest as an early and relatively rare iteration within the Bubble Back series, especially in white gold. Its larger case size for the period also makes it appealing to modern tastes. The presence of a date complication adds to its functionality, distinguishing it from simpler time-only Bubble Back models and highlighting Rolex's early integration of practical features.
Only fear that because of this I will also have to purchase the steel version (my RG version is due to arrive in a few weeks)
Your gusto is passionately conveyed through your writing, which is just as nice as the watch.
when I saw the MontBlanc I was immediaely sold by the great blue dial and layout, having the opportunity to visit the Minverva manufacture a few months ago no one needed to convince me on the fine handcraft these people make overthere. I allready have a 5070P but I think the MB 16.29 will be a nice addition to my chronographe collection, can't wait till they deliver but I suppose that could take another year or so, order has been placed anyway
Nice post Nico These MB are superb but I'm sure it is all a matter of taste, some prefer a Datograph, others a Vacheron, etc Same with the shape of the case , while you say a 5070 could look a bit more outdated .... that makes it imo much more beautiful. The lugs of the VC historic cornes de ache are for sure old fashioned but I think these are among the most beautiful lugs I ever saw. For me the MB case is a bit to simple to give it a perfect score. Movement ... again personal taste. Both are e
There are many things to discuss, which is very exciting. The hands, it is a wink to these old Chronographs. Liking them is indeed a matter of taste. Linking them to their roots is obvious. The shape of the case and lugs, it is clearly a choice dictacted by the willing to remember that these Chronographs were tool watches. The case is less " tortured " than the Patek, in comparison. While there is one thing I prefer on the Patek, it is its superb step bezel. The Strategy? I am not Jerome Lambert
I would not hesitate between 5070P and MB a second and go for 5070P. MB is very very nice but like Bruno said, there's nothing special in the case design. Based on the looks, MB beats easily 5170 but I suppose the latter is technically more sophisticated. Furthermore, it's WG vs. steel. We should naturally compare RG vs. WG. My business professors always said: "don't compare apples with oranges". I will travel soon to Singapore and try to make a visit to MB Boutique. If they have space in their
This thread is active on the Montblanc forum with 49 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →