Montblanc 1858 Monopusher Chronograph Steel
Review

Montblanc 1858 Monopusher Chronograph Steel

By amanico · Nov 22, 2015 · 49 replies
amanico
WPS member · Montblanc forum
49 replies22611 views10 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

amanico introduces the Montblanc 1858 Monopusher Chronograph Tachymeter in its steel version, drawing inspiration from Minerva's rich heritage. This post provides a detailed first look, comparing the new model to vintage chronographs from the 1930s and 40s, and setting the stage for a deeper discussion on its design and horological significance.

Minerva has a rich patrimony of some wonderful watches and movements. 

Montblanc revisits this large heritage, from time to time, in a modern way, for our biggest pleasure. 

Let me introduce you the steel version of the 1858 Chronograph Tachymeter, which also exists in rose gold. 

The rose gold version, which Foversta will review: 





 
The steel version takes its inspiration from different chronographs which were in production in the Thirties and Fourties. 

An example from the Thirties, side by side with the 1858:


And another one from the late Thirties, early Fourties: 


From the first, the 1858 takes the case, the coaxial monopusher and Cathedral hands. From the second, it takes the tachymeter. 

From both, the 1858 takes this incredible presence, spirit, the luminous hands and indexes, and the oversized case. An oversized case which is not so oversized from our days habits, since it is 44 mm big ( and 13, 5 mm high ). 


But this generous size is not only a matter of current trend. There is a good reason for such a generous case: The size of the movement, which is... 38, 4 mm big and 6, 3 mm high )! THAT is unusual, by our current standards. 

As we are at the movement, let's see this Cal 16.29, which is absolutely not disappointing. 

  

All the codes of belle ( or at least traditional ) horology are here: Cotes De Genève, perlage, beveling, mirror polish of some parts, swan neck, and this splendid " Devil's Tail ", which, in fact, is a Chronograph break lever. 

  

The 16.29 is a clear inspiration of the Cal 17.29 CH, born in 1929: 

  

Which you can see here, in a condition which would require a good service. 

  

The Cal 17.29 CH was already generously sized: 37, 9 mm big, 5, 85 mm high. 

Both the modern and the original beat at 18000 alternances per hour, have a column wheel, a large balance wheel. 

But the 16.29 has a better power reserve, with 50 hours, while the original had only 33 hours... A bit short.

The 16.29 adds a very sensual swan neck, and this beautiful " Devil's Tail ". 

That being said, what I like a lot is the fact that Montblanc didn't stick to one chronograph, for this 1858, but to several pieces. 

They opted for a classical tachymeter, instead of the snail one you can see on the dial of the chronograph from the Fourties posted above, they respected the spirit of the Chronograph from the Thirties, with choice of some key elements, such as:

- The Cathedral hands, which are luminous, as well as the indexes.

- The superb pear shaped crown.

- The Two subdial configuration. 

- Last but not least, the coaxial chronograph monopusher ( located in the crown ). 


The contributions from modernity are, naturally, the choice of luminova instead of radium as per the international reglementations, sapphire instead of plexy, a see through screwed case back, and the option of a blue dial for the steel version.

And another sensual touch is the use of an old Montblanc Logo, which I like a lot, much more than the better known " star symbol " to sign this dial. 


All in all, Montblanc achieved to find the right compromise between the Minerva Patrimony and Modernity, to respect the spirit of the vintage chronograph without sticking to it. 

The outcome is so breathtaking that, in my opinion, I rank it in the category of fine chronographs.

Dare I say, it is a Patek 5170 and 5070 killer. 

Let me demonstrate it with the following pictures: 

Patek 5170 / Montblanc 1858, front side:

  

Backside, Cal 16.29 / Cal 29-535:

 

The dial of the 1858 is much better balanced, its case is, at least in my opinion more sensual, the movement is better looking than the Patek, even if this last one has a power reserve which lasts 15 more hours. 

And if you add the fact that the 1858 is a bit more than twice less expensive, in rose gold ( 2, 5 in steel! ) than the 5170G... 

Patek 5070P / 1858 Steel... The comparison is cruel for this Patek which is... 5 times more expensive than the steel 1858.

You are not convinced?

Ok...

 

The dial of the 5070 has my preference over the 5170, but even here, Patek had to deal with a big case / small movement, which is obvious on the pictures and in the real. The 1858 is more harmonious. 

The 5070 has a lot of charm, the 1858 is much more harmonious, the movement of the Montlbanc looks more refined, the case of the Patek seems a bit outdated in comparison.... 

Some will object that it not a Patek. 

I would answer: " So what "? A signature on the dial doesn't make all.

When I see that kind of watch, I just want to applaud, and to call my banker to see if I can get one. 

It is well thought, not made in the easy way, a serious and reasonable offer. 

What more can we ask for? 

Bravo, Montblanc. Bravo. This may well be my first Montblanc, and I will wear it proudly! 

I just fear that the 100 pieces of this version will sell a bit too fast. 

I just have to confirm these thoughts with a test in the real world, just to see if it sings as loud in my wrist than on these official pictures.

I will keep you updated. 

Best,

Nicolas

  




This message has been edited by MTF on 2015-11-22 04:00:36 This message has been edited by amanico on 2016-04-11 22:45:39

About the Montblanc 1858 Collection Ref. 1858

The Rolex Bubble Back, reference 1858, represents an early example of Rolex's self-winding waterproof wristwatches. This reference is part of the broader Bubble Back family, characterized by its distinctive domed case back designed to accommodate the thicker automatic movement of the era. It showcases Rolex's foundational efforts in developing robust and reliable automatic timepieces for everyday wear, laying groundwork for future Oyster Perpetual models.

This particular reference features an 18k white gold case, measuring 38mm in diameter. It is fitted with a sapphire crystal, protecting a silver dial. The watch is powered by an automatic movement, specifically the Boucheron 1858 caliber, offering a power reserve of 42 hours. The fixed bezel and leather strap complete the watch's classic presentation.

For collectors, the reference 1858 holds interest as an early and relatively rare iteration within the Bubble Back series, especially in white gold. Its larger case size for the period also makes it appealing to modern tastes. The presence of a date complication adds to its functionality, distinguishing it from simpler time-only Bubble Back models and highlighting Rolex's early integration of practical features.

Specifications

Caliber
Boucheron 1858
Case
18k white gold
Diameter
38mm
Dial
Silver
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
AL
Alex 007
Nov 22, 2015

Only fear that because of this I will also have to purchase the steel version (my RG version is due to arrive in a few weeks)

LU
Luis6
Nov 22, 2015

Your gusto is passionately conveyed through your writing, which is just as nice as the watch.

P@
P@trick@Belgium
Nov 22, 2015

when I saw the MontBlanc I was immediaely sold by the great blue dial and layout, having the opportunity to visit the Minverva manufacture a few months ago no one needed to convince me on the fine handcraft these people make overthere. I allready have a 5070P but I think the MB 16.29 will be a nice addition to my chronographe collection, can't wait till they deliver but I suppose that could take another year or so, order has been placed anyway

BR
Bruno.M1
Nov 22, 2015

Nice post Nico These MB are superb but I'm sure it is all a matter of taste, some prefer a Datograph, others a Vacheron, etc Same with the shape of the case , while you say a 5070 could look a bit more outdated .... that makes it imo much more beautiful. The lugs of the VC historic cornes de ache are for sure old fashioned but I think these are among the most beautiful lugs I ever saw. For me the MB case is a bit to simple to give it a perfect score. Movement ... again personal taste. Both are e

AM
amanico
Nov 22, 2015

There are many things to discuss, which is very exciting. The hands, it is a wink to these old Chronographs. Liking them is indeed a matter of taste. Linking them to their roots is obvious. The shape of the case and lugs, it is clearly a choice dictacted by the willing to remember that these Chronographs were tool watches. The case is less " tortured " than the Patek, in comparison. While there is one thing I prefer on the Patek, it is its superb step bezel. The Strategy? I am not Jerome Lambert

DR
dr.kol
Nov 22, 2015

I would not hesitate between 5070P and MB a second and go for 5070P. MB is very very nice but like Bruno said, there's nothing special in the case design. Based on the looks, MB beats easily 5170 but I suppose the latter is technically more sophisticated. Furthermore, it's WG vs. steel. We should naturally compare RG vs. WG. My business professors always said: "don't compare apples with oranges". I will travel soon to Singapore and try to make a visit to MB Boutique. If they have space in their

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Montblanc forum with 49 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →