
Kong introduces the Breguet Type XXII 3880 ST 10Hz Chronograph with Flyback, a groundbreaking timepiece featuring a high-frequency movement. His detailed post highlights the watch's technical innovations, including its 10Hz (72,000 VPH) movement with silicon escapement and its unique 30-second chronograph hand rotation, inviting discussion on its functionality and design.




but I find the execution needlessly complex. I think if they hadn't included the second timezone and used that dial at 3 o'clock as a 15 min totalizer or something more chrono-centric. It just seems that they dropped too much of the chroo function to add in the TZ A
It's very cool. It has Breguet DNA. I find the dial very busy, but... this may be the idea... The peek a boo in back is fun. Also reminds the owner that this watch comes from a premier house... It's not my Breguet but I have to say they did a nice job, retaining their OWN blood and bones... and not copying AP, Rolex, or Panerai... I owned a Type 21 for a while... it's a stunning dial and the dial-quality is up there with 50K plus watches, IMHO... these are special watches.... I don't 'get' the c
i like the Dial Layout and color scheme. thanks for posting
This is a powerhouse watch...I exceptionally like the way the second hand glides across the dial fluidly.
this model retains the dna and takes a bold step to rival the zenith striking 10th...not my cup of tea but well done breguet!
Thanks for the instructive post. Considering that the type XXII wiht the HF movement features an impressive innovation, i think it has not received the attention it deserves. I find the 30 seconds totalizer way better than the solution with a small aperture that was shown a year ago on the 2010 presentation model. Obviously the unanimous critique of the PuristS was heard by Breguet. The 30 second totalizer might be still not that easy to read but it seems tat with a little bit of practice it can
This thread is active on the Breguet forum with 18 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →