A. Lange & Söhne Double Split vs. Triple Split: A Collector's Comparison

amanico · 2020-06-01T04:06:57Z

Explore the A. Lange & Söhne Double Split vs. Triple Split. Collectors compare technical merits, wearability, and value of these iconic rattrapante chronographs.

Nicolas (amanico) initiates a compelling discussion comparing two of A. Lange & Söhne's most technically ambitious chronographs: the Double Split and the Triple Split. His post, featuring striking images of both, sets the stage for collectors to weigh in on the merits and allure of these highly complicated rattrapante movements. This comparison remains highly relevant for enthusiasts considering these pinnacle examples of German watchmaking.

Key Points from the Discussion

The Triple Split offers enhanced functionality (measuring events up to 12 hours) with minimal increase in dimensions compared to the Double Split, making its additional complexity a compelling advantage for some collectors.
The choice between the two can come down to aesthetic preferences, such as dial numerals (Roman vs. Arabic) and case material, which can impact wearability and visual appeal.
The existence of the Triple Split can diminish the 'grail' status of the Double Split for some collectors, despite the significant price difference and rarity of the Triple Split.
From a value perspective, the Double Split is often considered a strong proposition, available for significantly less than the Triple Split, prompting a debate on whether the Triple Split's additional complication justifies its premium.
Even without experiencing the Triple Split in person, some collectors find the Double Split to be a perfectly satisfying and impressive timepiece, highlighting its enduring appeal and value.

The Discussion

dedestexhes

Jun 1, 2020

Well, the only one I did wear is the double split... [nt]

It was heavy, rain imposing but mesmerizing. I would say, currently still great value for money. Never seen the triple in the flesh... But I could live with the double 😉 Cheers, Dirk

mpg13

Jun 1, 2020

The Triple Split seems more logical to me. It would be useful for timing up to 24 hours as one is not likely to forget the 12 hour hand has gone around once already. [nt]

amanico

Jun 1, 2020

Yes, it is a marvel. The thing is to know if it will be a one shot, or not. [nt]

damianp

Jun 1, 2020

Haven't Seen the Triple irl, but judging from Pictures and tech sheet....

I'd Go with the triple split. It's got the same diameter and is only .3 mm thicker than the double split, which is very little for a watch that's already above 15mm. The White gold case should make it less heavy than a Platinum one, which helps wearability for such a large watch. Also, I'm Not a big fan of roman numerals, which is the reason why I prefer the dial of the triple to the (Platinum) Double. Judgment can of course be very different on the wrist.

amanico

Jun 1, 2020

I prefer the dial of the Triple Split as I find it better balanced... [nt]

holdemchamp1225

Jun 1, 2020

Both are huge on the wrist but I like the dial more on the Triple Split as well as the technical marvel that it is 🔥🔥

Settling for a Double Split is not a bad thing in any case 😜

A. Lange & Söhne Double Split vs. Triple Split: A Collector's Comparison

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

Related Articles