Collection
Amanico's comprehensive comparison of the A. Lange & Söhne Datograph and Double Split remains a foundational discussion for collectors evaluating these two iconic chronographs. His detailed analysis, supported by excellent photography, delves into the nuances of movement sophistication, case dimensions, and dial aesthetics. This article continues to be highly relevant for understanding the design philosophy and technical prowess behind Lange's most celebrated chronographs.
Richard Mille RM004 Split-Seconds Chronograph
The RM004 represents Richard Mille's split-seconds chronograph offering, distinguished by its manual-winding movement and skeletonized dial construction. Produced from 2003 to 2010, this reference demonstrates the brand's approach to high-complication timepieces within a compact case format.
The 38mm titanium case houses the manual-winding RM004 caliber, providing a 55-hour power reserve. The skeletonized dial reveals the movement architecture beneath a sapphire crystal. Water resistance extends to 50 meters, and the watch is fitted with a rubber strap. The fixed bezel maintains the case's streamlined profile.
This reference appeals to collectors seeking Richard Mille's take on the split-seconds complication in a relatively understated package. The titanium construction and skeletonized dial execution align with contemporary preferences for technical displays and lightweight materials. The seven-year production run establishes the RM004 as a core reference within the brand's chronograph offerings.
the GO Rattrapante in PT? Its definitely smaller than the double split and while not in the same league as the ALS, perhaps at the price point, it is a good alternative? And still German
Size is not that big of a problem for me on the Double Split, it's the weight. The massive PT case just weighs a ton. I'm waiting for them to make a SS one or even a titanium DS! Thanks, Nicolas!
the wearability/aesthetics of a watch is more important to me than its technical sophistication, because ultimately it has to sit on our wrists. the datograph is just manageable for me for its height, but am compensated with the depth of the movement. it would been perfect if it's a tad thinner on the wrist.
It is of course very personal and subjective, but to me, the art of watch-making is to make it more complicated and smaller. In this regard, I value Patek much more than Lange. A good watch must be wearable. Between Datograph and Double Split, my clear personal favorite is Dato. Double is kind of show, for me, too much. 5004 is, however, so nice and decent. Not even to mention 5959!
No way I'd get rid of the dato for the DS.I tried it twice just for the fun of it(never crossed my mind to consider it).Its too thick and too big for anyone on this planet !but most of all too heavy!!!!!Oh dear thats a downside of Pt watches.My Grande L1 is already on the limit weight wise,but the DS is unwearable.Maybe with the right stand it would make a wonderful table clock.Not a wristwatch IMO and i wonder what are the sales of it and what Lange thinks of this creation.Thats why we always t
These two were at the top of my agenda at one time. I went back and forth between the two so many times and eventually ended up with neither.If I had to choose between the two now, it would be the Dato. However, my favorite Lange chrono is still the 1815. Best Fernando
This thread is active on the A. Lange & Söhne forum with 63 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
