FS: Patek Philippe RG 3970 Perpetual/Chronograph (lowest price)

Jan 01, 2009,15:56 PM
 

Brand: Patek Philippe - (more)

Series: Patek RG 3970 Perpetual/Chronograph (lowest price)

Model: RG 3970 Perpetual/Chronograph (lowest price)

Condition: MINT

Location: Japan Japan 

Status: FS

Listed: Jan 2, 2009, 12:23 AM

Asking Price: USD 91,500 

Retail Price: USD 

Payment Info:

Remarks:

Please note all transactions and listing are between private parties WatchProSite/PuristSPro make no Warranties or Guaranties of any kind is the responsibility of the Buyers and Sellers.

Model: Rose Gold 3970 Perpetual Calendar/Chronograph

Case Size: 36mm

Movement: Hand-Wound Mechanical

Sellers Comments:

I am offering my Patek RG3970 Perpetual Calendar/Chronograph for sale. The watch comes with all boxes/papers (stamped 2004 from Gubelin Geneva), as well as the second back (unused) and push tool. The watch has been worn very rarely and there are only minor surface imperfections. The original brown strap is 100% (I use a third-party strap and buckle), and comes with both RG deployant and tang buckles.

I and the watch are located in Tokyo, Japan. Depending on your location (i.e., Asia) , I may be able arrange to deliver the watch to you personally.

I need to sell the watch ASAP to finance my latest dream watch (Urwerk!!), and this price is pretty much as low as I can go.  If the watch doesn't sell at this price, it will be sold to a used dealer soon.    

If you have been waiting for a PP3970, this is a great opportunity to snatch one up at retail.  The watch is priced thousands below all the other RG3970s I have seen recently, often with far less desirable providence. 

I am a long-time Purist and have numerous references selling and buying. I can also email pictures of the actual watch/boxes/papers to serious buyers. Thank you for reading.

Serious buyers please contact me at stultus77 @ yahoo.com

- Daniel

This message has been edited by stultus77 on 2009-01-01 16:23:03

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

comment

 
 By: christopher.johnson : March 6th, 2009-13:38