Not sure yet

Sep 08, 2009,22:45 PM
 

waiting for the guys to go home and check. But from what they can remember, it should be pic A.

Anyway, what is the diff between the 2 certs you showed? And if the XP is not COSC, why the confusion here?

Thanks Kong!
Lionel

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Chronometer certification on the XP?

 
 By: zephyr49 : September 7th, 2009-19:47
A few of my friends have the XP (not the XPS) and I was told the XP came with a COSC certificate. We were wondering why is this so and do everyone here with the XP also have the COSC? Just wondering how the XP without any seconds hand can be COSC certifie... 

XP & COSC ...

 
 By: Kong : September 8th, 2009-03:12
XP is not COSC certified as what you've said. There is no second-hand in the L.U.C 96HM only the new variation, L.U.C 12.96 in the XPS is modified to include a second-hand, however, it is still pending if it will be submitted for COSC certification. By th...  

Not sure yet

 
 By: zephyr49 : September 8th, 2009-22:45
waiting for the guys to go home and check. But from what they can remember, it should be pic A. Anyway, what is the diff between the 2 certs you showed? And if the XP is not COSC, why the confusion here? Thanks Kong! Lionel

I guess likely to be the set of ...

 
 By: Kong : September 9th, 2009-11:04
2A & 2B. They are the front & back of the same paper. Cert 2A/2B is by Chopard, I'm not sure if placed in by the local Chopard or Geneva. The official COSC certificate is as shown in Pic#1 with testing results. As to why the Cert (2A/2B) was in th...