erhm
162
As a follow up:
Mar 06, 2021,11:18 AM
Older pieces tended to be smaller—much smaller—than some of today’s watches. A matter of aesthetics over which folks can (and do) argue. My taste tends towards calendar models and moon phases and complications all of which can be problematic when it comes to limited dial real estate. So, the other end of the question, when is a watch too small? Here, I would argue the perpetual calendar is difficult to decipher, never mind the Dataograph Perpetuals! The two that see the most wrist time is the Perpetual Tourbillon and the Terraluna (not shown).
Comments:
view entire thread
Three Heavy Weights
By: erhm : March 6th, 2021-09:37
There are many ways to judge a time piece. Style, movement, and finishing are the usual categories. Size & weight are factors, but for me, only as disqualifying ones. I actually prefer heavier metals and a bit of size—substance—to the haute horology ultra...
I love it too...
By: erhm : March 6th, 2021-11:15
But it is a bear to set, so it is one of the few I keep on a winder.
What a trio! And that UN is boss!!!
By: Obeezy : March 6th, 2021-10:57
My largest are likely the Zeitwerk and Urwerk 202S. As far as a disqualifier—hmmm perhaps the color of the metal.
As a follow up:
By: erhm : March 6th, 2021-11:18
Older pieces tended to be smaller—much smaller—than some of today’s watches. A matter of aesthetics over which folks can (and do) argue. My taste tends towards calendar models and moon phases and complications all of which can be problematic when it comes...