MichaelC[AP Moderator]
18870
In my opinion, no, a "bold" move is not needed (especially this specific one)
Jul 10, 2017,07:37 AM
This whole date issue, which carries across all of our favorite brands, we focus on it too much. I admit I like the date on some watches, and not on others. I have been critical of Ulysse Nardin placing date windows on some of the recent releases, especially the vintage style ones, where I feel the hole in the dial diminishes the overall. But we can probably assume 90% of clients who walk into watch stores want or expect a new watch to have a date on it. So don't hold your breath about a brand doing anything that will negatively affect their own bottom line.
Many expressed concern when Kering Group acquired Ulysse Nardin. But in fairness, I see no negative impact at all. We still see the UN "madness" in new designs. I would like to see it trickle down to more moderately priced offerings, but even under Rolf's leadership this practice was not common. It is clear that Kering brings substantial financial backing to this awesome brand, but it seems as though the business of designing and producing watches remains under UN's direct leadership. This is good for us.
Now, do I dream of other happenings from UN? Of course I do....