marcobermann
200
Great logical post patrick_y but
Apr 12, 2024,08:51 AM
I can't agree with you saying " that individual paid $200K for jewelry ,got $200K value in jewelry" as if he attempted to sell and recoup the spent money IMO he would be lucky to see even 45% of it back.
Marc
Comments:
view entire thread
I am principally....
By: InHavenPro : April 11th, 2024-07:10
not against this course of action at all! Good luck to them....
You don't have to be a "faithful" client
By: jim_94104 : April 11th, 2024-09:48
there are all sorts of coaching videos on YouTube. Telling one what to buy and price ratio to buy, in order to get an "allocation" of the bag you want. It is actually quite hilarious if you stop and think about this for a second 😅
;)
By: amanico : April 11th, 2024-12:33
I struggle to understand this
By: marcobermann : April 11th, 2024-11:33
Hi all, I mean to me it really is quite simple for anyone that makes anything be it a watch, car, handbag etc etc they should have the right to sell it or in this case not sell it to anyone of their choosing for whatever reasons they may have. I also find...
Agree 1000%
By: jp884 : April 11th, 2024-14:23
It’s ridiculous that this suit is even brought up. You don’t have a right to buy something and someone has the right not to sell it. If you don’t like that buy something else. There are many watch manufacturers that I won’t consider anymore because they p...
It depends upon the reason for not selling...
By: mdg : April 11th, 2024-20:54
...if you advertise something for sale and advertise the price, and somebody says 'I'll take it' and you don't sell it, isn't this some sort of false advertising? I don't care either way because I would figure out something else to do with my money. But I...
Fully agree. What a pathetic lawsuit.
By: vitalsigns : April 11th, 2024-13:24
I don't have to like Hermes (or the analogue in the watch world) business model to dismiss this lawsuit as B.S.
I agree!
By: eklektik : April 11th, 2024-18:40
I would find mindboggling that they use the bag after winning the trial!
I don't necessarily agree with the necessity of a law suit here
By: jim_94104 : April 11th, 2024-15:15
and my iq level is below average. but I think the argument is not about loyal customers getting the allocation but exposing unethical sales practice of "coercing" customers into buying $x of unwanted merchandise just to get what they want. I should also p...
Great logical post patrick_y but
By: marcobermann : April 12th, 2024-08:51
I can't agree with you saying " that individual paid $200K for jewelry ,got $200K value in jewelry" as if he attempted to sell and recoup the spent money IMO he would be lucky to see even 45% of it back. Marc
Probably.
By: patrick_y : April 12th, 2024-21:34
Nevertheless, there is a cost to getting something new and from a reputable store like Shreve. Remember, once a car is sold and rolls off a dealership, it's no longer "new" since it's been titled. So, there's a large drop in value simply because an item i...