Nihad
8
Thanks Suitbert...I have been...
Mar 09, 2007,15:23 PM
a lurker for years just havent posted much...
I guess what I really wish for is an Annual calendar in a larger case ( max 42mm).
The reason I mentioned the 5070 is that for one it is my favorite PP and second It
sits perfectly on my wrist. For someone like me who can't afford to have more than one or at most two
Pateks, a 5070 with Annual Calendar would be the ONLY Patek I would keep. But the way things
are, I would want to get an annual calendar ( may be 5135) to go with a 5070.
Best,
Nihad
Comments:
view entire thread
Welcome, Nihad..
By: SuitbertW : March 9th, 2007-15:06
....to our forum! Well, I'm with Steve here, 5070 is very nice, but even adding a hour counter would be too much, IMO. I find the case style, functions and dial layout/design are pleasantly consistent - which isn't found that often. A perpetual would requ...
Thanks Suitbert...I have been...
By: Nihad : March 9th, 2007-15:23
a lurker for years just havent posted much... I guess what I really wish for is an Annual calendar in a larger case ( max 42mm). The reason I mentioned the 5070 is that for one it is my favorite PP and second It sits perfectly on my wrist. For someone lik...
I second that!
By: octop8 : March 10th, 2007-00:28
I have both and the 5135 is my daily wearer! Both in WG......
If you like larges cases calendar......
By: WatchFan1 : March 10th, 2007-20:53
why not get the new "limited edition 5145" ? No silicone escape wheel and spyromax.......but with added Perpetual calendar module....... .......and as per usual Patek custom - for mere $20,000 'perpetual' premium ;-) ...just kidding......IMO 5146 is reaso...
I agree with you somewhat, Milos....but would not..
By: Nihad : March 11th, 2007-02:35
like to see any changes to the 5135 as its already got everything...I am not very keen on having a perpetual calendar. I guess pressing the date pusher 3 times a year is no bother ;-) I did try the 5146 but that too looked too small on my wrist. see for y...