Mr. M
87
What do you think?
Feb 15, 2017,07:05 AM
5 and 27 around the moon phase are minimized to fit the dial, just as on the 5140. However on the 5140 it is often mentioned as a negative thing, but apparently it doens't matter on the 5204? What do you think... Great review by the way Mark
Comments:
view entire thread
Mark, you did it again.
By: dr.kol : January 11th, 2017-23:38
What a fantastic post, thank you! For me ref. 5204 (naturally P) is one of the very greatest modern Patek. Only 5370P is able to win it but naturally, that opinion is totally subjective. I really do not see the point why a very sporty complication like sp...
Mark I am speechless.
By: Miles_151 : January 12th, 2017-01:10
Thank you so much for putting so much time and effort into that wonderful in depth review. Your passion is addictive. You clearly have a deep love and understanding of that beautiful Patek Piece. I\'m going to read it again later today when I get 15mins a...
Thank you
By: coz : January 12th, 2017-07:31
Thank you for the detailed article! I do prefer the older hands personally than this model. Does the new movement here and in the 5270 lose the adjustment to advance a day at a time including moon phase like the Lemania versions had? Best regards
Good question
By: Mark in Paris : January 13th, 2017-08:34
It seemed to me the 5970 had this all-in-one very useful feature and I know the 5270 doesn't. I couldn't manipulate the buttons of the 5970 and see this by myself and when I asked a retailer he told me that he didn't know about such feature in the 5970 so...
Unfortunately not...
By: p.boxster : January 15th, 2017-00:35
Neither the 5270 nor the 5204 have the feature to advance all indications at once... that\'s the only downside compared to Lange (1815 rattrapante, dato perpetual) and the 5970 (and 5004 I think, but didn\'t check myself)... I don\'t know why such a usefu...
We have similar approach
By: beejo : January 13th, 2017-16:58
When it comes to watches.....I am glad we met here in the forum,Would be happy to meet face to face one day.I am sure it would be very interesting to meet some one with your knowledge. Getting your dream watch or grail as we may call it is something and g...
Great great review
By: Mr. M : January 12th, 2017-12:04
Thanks Mark, really enjoyed this post. In my opinion one of the most attractive references in the available range right now. What would I change? Squeeze it down to a size between 36,5 or max 38 mm, but keep the thick case. I am not a fan of the coated ma...
Thank you Vwong
By: Mark in Paris : January 28th, 2017-06:34
So do I. I don't know if there is a technical reason behind it. About other metals, I think they will indeed, at least in Platinum. Will it come in yellow gold too? I don't know but as there is a come back of yellow gold watches, maybe yes Best, Mark
What do you think?
By: Mr. M : February 15th, 2017-07:05
5 and 27 around the moon phase are minimized to fit the dial, just as on the 5140. However on the 5140 it is often mentioned as a negative thing, but apparently it doens't matter on the 5204? What do you think... Great review by the way Mark
Thanks for your comments
By: Mr. M : February 15th, 2017-11:31
Actually I first noticed the squeezed numbers on the watch after seeing your pictures. I can see that the 5004 came with variations in the hour markers. I hope to see the 5204 follow that path as I am not the biggest fan of lumiscent on this particular re...
Phenomenal write-up!
By: brandon1 : February 17th, 2017-08:07
Mark, Thank you for taking the time to write such a thorough and well-illustrated review, and for including DJE's content to remind us of the technical elements. Great pictures and feedback, especially regarding the tactile feel of the pushers and winding...