watch-guy.com
4255
5800 is a weird reference for me
It costs almost as much as a 3700 but is the same size exactly as the 3800 which does not have a sapphire case back and upgraded movement
Is it worth paying the premium for the 5800 ( also many less were sold as it was made for 1 year only)
hard to justify but we are weird mob and will pay premiums for any small difference
Jusyt to confuse even further here is my 3800 - I have a small wrist and wear mainly vintage pieces so I find the 38 mm size perfect
Good luck
[Pic rotated -- FabR]
This message has been edited by FabR on 2021-09-02 23:34:58
More posts:
I was interested in # 5800 but haven't bought it yet
My arms are a little thin, and in the case of Aqunaut, # 5065 fits better than # 5167. So I like # 5711 and was very interested in # 5800. I cut out the photo and wrapped it around my arm This is the original photo. Looks very good Aquanaut case (5167 &am...
Hi Shun, thanks for a fun and interesting comparison -- both looking gorgeous in my view, and nothing wrong with a slightly larger size for a Nautilus, like you can have with the 5711 ;-)
And I do agree -- the current values of the 5800 are *insanely* high, so given that one of my rules is to never buy above MSRP, I'd probably pass on it too! ;-)) PS: I slightly adjusted and rotated the last two pics for everyone to view them better. Cheer...
An ingenious way to test out the size of a watch !
In a paper cut-out and in the metal, the 5800 seems smallish on your wrist. Perhaps if you really like 5800, you could trade your 5711 for the 5800 ?
5800 is a weird reference for me
It costs almost as much as a 3700 but is the same size exactly as the 3800 which does not have a sapphire case back and upgraded movement Is it worth paying the premium for the 5800 ( also many less were sold as it was made for 1 year only) hard to justif...
i'm colour blind so I cannot tell
Here is my attempt at photoshop - trying to green the dial ...
