Comments:
<< Previous Comments
I can see why you traded it
Both are great superior watches but the ALS brings more diversity to your collection.
Two great pieces, but I very much concur with your choice for your marvellous MMR !
Also, I find the dial on the PC/ Pt skeletonized somewhat difficult to read.
BTW: great pic of the two, needless to say..
And I also confess, I really love your MMR/ Ti, which I once several years ago,
had the immense pleasure to wear for several hours..
And in addition I find the ALS Emil Lange Moon Phase an absolutely superb watch,
so sublime
BTW: great pic of the two, needless to say..
And I also confess, I really love your MMR/ Ti, which I once several years ago,
had the immense pleasure to wear for several hours..
And in addition I find the ALS Emil Lange Moon Phase an absolutely superb watch,
so sublime
I couldn't go wrong here, indeed. But still, I liked this perpetual skeleton. Thanks, my dear H.
Two heavyweights. Are the cases the same size?
I too find the Perpetual hard to read but that is solely based on the photos above.
I will say, my first thought was that it’s an unusual trade, this Perpetual out and the Emil in. Unusual insofar as visually it’s hard to understand the same person would like both. But of course I know from my own experience that we can move from A to Z in terms of design and aesthetic and be equally as happy.
41, 5 mm for the Perpetual, 44 mm for the MMR. Yes, totally different beasts, compared to the 1815 E Lange.