Comments:
The wording is much more discrete in the real. But you are right, it was not necessary to mention that we were facing a Tourbillon... [nt]
No message body
I wholeheartedly agree with both points
I’m not a great fan of Tourbillons, except in a few instances- this being one of them. This movement is a spectacular sight with an elegant architecture and complimented with the enamel dial. A perfect and complete package.
Yes, these LF movements start to eat my brain, too... As for the enamel dial, it is just exquisite. [nt]
No message body
im also not typically into Tourbillons....
However this watch reminds of the reasons that I do like the Patek Gondolo 5101P....
That's another good example. Now, I feel the LF has a superior finishing ( movement ). [nt]
No message body
Depends, they have some good watches, such as the World Time, for example. [nt]
No message body
Big plus for not exposing the tourbillon through the dial!
Does anyone else do that apart from Patek?