Comments:
Display to size ratio wise the 5004, sadly I can’t unsee the small moment in the big case of the 5970, even if I love the Lemania heritage,
So for me it’s the 5270( with the chin), due to the bigger month-day and cleaner overall look of the dial.
But to be honest, for me personally, nothing beats the 3970.
The 5270 family:
Best, Zsolt.
But to be honest, for me personally, nothing beats the 3970.
The 5270 family:
Best, Zsolt.
I'm glad you speak in favour of the 5270:
I think it is underrated. And I fully understand why you even prefer the 3970, which is wonderful.
Best, Emmanuel
Best, Emmanuel
I'm glad you vote for the 5270: it's an underestimated reference, imo.
Best, Emmanuel
100% 100% 100%
5004 in any metal!!!!
Did I say 5004??
The arabics.
The split second. The history. The movement. The endearing size and so called “hamburger” effect. It’s a quintessential Patek and one of the all time greats.
The others are beautiful. I am fortunate enough (very) to own. 5970g a 5270g and P and a 5004g. Of the three models the 5004 would be the last to go without a shadow of a doubt.
Did I say 5004??
The arabics.
The split second. The history. The movement. The endearing size and so called “hamburger” effect. It’s a quintessential Patek and one of the all time greats.
The others are beautiful. I am fortunate enough (very) to own. 5970g a 5270g and P and a 5004g. Of the three models the 5004 would be the last to go without a shadow of a doubt.
Your dilemma.
I would gladly leave these two watches to anyone who is interested and I will go and try to find a 5100P or a 5105P or a 5101P.
Yours is quite the collection!
I completely understand your feeling concerning the 5004. It is quintessential Patek indeed and, to a certain extent, more full of charm and appeal than the 5970.
Best, Emmanuel