Forum Civility: Respectful Discourse

WPS member · Horological Meandering forum

132 replies12561 views2 photos

zabreg1 Mr White addresses a concerning rise in disrespectful discourse within the forum, advocating for a return to civility and mutual respect among members. He uses a personal example to underscore the importance of individual preference and calls for a zero-tolerance policy against racism, insults, and stereotyping to preserve the community's integrity.

Lately, I have noticed some vitriol in the forum that wasn’t present before. There has been a degradation of respectful conversation and opinions. Starting with racism, insults, stereotyping, etc... this has gone too far for my liking.
As a member, I feel this is a place where I am allowed to express my honest opinion and not be disrespected for it. Disagreed with, surely, but not disrespected.
So, if I decide this is a look for me, it is my prerogative.

Like it or not, it is my decision. I am always willing to read other people’s comments and opinions, as long as they are respectful. I might ght listen to you or I might not.

In any case, this is just my attempt at adding some levity to a serious issue. It is not meant to be polarizing.
Rather, I would like to help dial back some of the behaviors described above.
Let’s keep this a place where civilized people exchange opinions, ideas and passions, and where each is respected, not based on personal preference but on the merit of the person him or herself.
In my opinion, there should be a zero tolerance policy of such behavior.

I hope you all have a nice Sunday.

Key Points from the Discussion

Racism is unequivocally unacceptable and should be met with a zero-tolerance policy, distinct from subjective taste or general forum discussions.
The community should maintain high standards of respectful interaction, treating the forum as a 'cocktail party' where members share passion and knowledge openly.
Different individuals have varying tolerances for what constitutes racism, making it crucial for moderators to assess situations carefully and act when they perceive racism.
Members should call out and expose individuals who post offensive comments, as community support can help victims overcome feelings of powerlessness.
The challenges of written communication, including language subtleties and regional interpretations, can lead to misinterpretations, suggesting a relaxed stance and self-censorship ('if you're in doubt - don't post') for adult interaction.
While acknowledging isolated incidents, the forum generally maintains a gentlemanly atmosphere, with administrators acting swiftly on clear violations like racial slurs.

The Discussion

Arie - Mr Orange

Dec 10, 2017

🤣 On a serious note: in agreement.

Baron - Mr Red

Dec 10, 2017

I think you make a number of very valid points. Nobody has a monopoly on “good taste”. Therefore nobody should feel entitled to judge another based on pure subjective taste. Totally agree. Racism and stereotyping are interesting subjects and have obviously been discussed by the Moderator team. I think it is right to say that each individual has a spectrum of tolerance for racism. Some see it as a part of everyday life and accept it as that. Some say that most racism is imagined rather than reall

zabreg1 Mr White

Dec 10, 2017

And I agree with you 150%.

MCG (Markus)

Dec 10, 2017

But that's only my opinion, and I am not soooo often here.... Maybe I just pass by the things that are not my piece of cake - as in normal life... Regarding your pictures in this post: Might be your style, and that's fine. Not mine though... Is this (still) allowed to say here? 😉

Pretty Boy

Dec 10, 2017

But seriously, as you said, we all have different styles and tastes. And that’s a good thing. Cheers.

KMII

Dec 10, 2017

Did you credit the pictures accordingly? I’m not sure I buy you having the chronograph running constantly

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 132 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

More from this Forum