Discussion
Clueless_Collector's original post sparks a fascinating comparative discussion, placing the Omega CK 859 alongside horological giants like A. Lange & Söhne, Chopard, and Patek Philippe. This article delves into the community's nuanced perspectives on how the Omega reference holds its own against these iconic dress watches, exploring aspects from dial aesthetics to movement technology and overall collector appeal.
I wonder if Chopard changed to thicker prints on the LUC even compared with my older model
That Omega is really nice, esp. with the domed crystal. Awesome offering at that price point. The devil, as always, in the details, such as under a loupe or when you look at the case back. But, on the dial side all are great! I wonder how the Omega compares with SBGW 231!
Movement is commercial 8926 which is METAS but of course not expecting much hand polishing etc.
With the modern manual wind movement, it is quite acceptable and yes, totally a value proposition piece.
Beauty is always all in the eye of the beholder! I'll count on you to tell me which one is your favorite. For me, I really like that 5196P. And that 1815 Lange in 40mm is my favorite Lange. I've got simpler tastes, I only wanted the white gold version.
Dial and case, it is certainly on par (if not better) than the others. Of course the movement finish is more elaborate on the others but technically the movement in the Omega is far more advanced. Altogether an awesome group of which (I have to confess) the Chopard is my favorite.
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 46 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
