
Amanico presents a detailed photographic essay and personal reflections on the Vacheron Constantin Ref. 47245 Day + Retrograde Date, particularly focusing on the platinum version with a black dial. The author praises its aesthetic virtues, unique case design, and the captivating retrograde date complication.
Thank you for providing some excellent photos and thoughts on the ref. 47245, Day + Retrograde Date. We do not often get to see this platinum black dial version of the 47245, and it is the loveliest incarnation of the retrograde date from VC in modern times, I think. The more recent and current production Patrimony Contemporaine Retrograde Day And Date ( ref. 86020) is, in fact, the first VC I ever fell in love with. But over time I have come to appreciate the 47245 a bit more. It is, as you say
As for the comparison between this reference and its current version, for me, there is no match. This one is much more appealing. Thanks for your great input, Respo! Best, Nicolas
You are right, this watch is a marvel. I love the black dial on platinum, and the numerals, 2,4,6,8,10,12 is not a common layout, but it makes total sense and aesthically is perfect on this dial. Another one to add to my ever growing list. Simply elegant, and beautiful. Dean
Will try to write something on that. Best, Nicolas
Hi Nicolas, thanks for posting up on this watch, and your spot on comments. I agree with you on all the points you made. Respo covered all the add comments I was going to make. My piece has just finished its time at the spa, and I have to get to NYC boutique to pick it up. (Of course, I will want to see some of the other pieces while I am there!) I just wanted to add one additional point. The guilloche on this dial adds so much to the watch. I have two photos below which show this. Best, Joe
1,126 Jaeger LeCoultre listings are live on the eBay market and 547 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.
This thread is active on the Vacheron Constantin forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →