
In a compelling analysis, 'this_hobby_of_hours' explores whether the recent surge in interest for the Vacheron Constantin 222, following its re-edition, could foreshadow a similar trajectory for the Girard-Perregaux Laureato 8010 and 8017. This discussion is particularly timely as the Laureato approaches its 50th anniversary, prompting a re-evaluation of these 'forgotten' neo-vintage mechanical references and their potential for renewed collector appreciation.





Especially given the opportunity to obtain previous pieces at great value, I’m eager to see a revival next year.
Well said. This brand (GP) is a bit whacky … they have such an amazing history and they do such a shitty job in making it all clear to collectors. 😄 🤝
To me, the Laureato just never looked great on my wrist. However, I do feel that the movement is much better than many other equivalent models - as the GP movement is higher end than the Chopard Alpine Eagle movement. But not necessarily higher end overall than the Bulgari Octo Finissimo BVL 138 ultra thin movement. I do like the Vacheron Constantin 222 a lot. People tend to go for the top end stuff. The middle-end is a no-man's land sometime. Vacheron Constantin is a top-end brand and will like
VC was already hot with overseas. So releasing 222 was at the peak of the watch craze was very smart. GP, with all due respect, is not on the same level and doesn’t have the pedigree or the demand. Just IMHO.
What would you like to see and or anticipate Marc?
But the vintage 222s have had a massive rise in market value already years before the reissue 222 was released - not sure the same dynamics apply to the Laureato 🤷🏻♂️
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 23 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →