
Horo_Traveler initiates a fascinating comparison of ultra-thin watchmaking, spotlighting the Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin (MUT) 34 and the Citizen Eco-Drive One. This discussion delves into the engineering marvels behind these slim profiles and prompts a broader conversation among collectors about the practicalities and aesthetic appeal of ultra-thin timepieces in daily wear. Horo_Traveler's original post, enriched with illustrative images, serves as a springboard for exploring the nuanced world of horological thinness.



Now you have me curious to go look at the Citizen. I like thin watches up to a point, beyond which they seem too delicate. I really admire the design and craft that goes into making thin movements.
I agree, I think at some point everyday wear comes into question due to the delicate/ and thinness of the movement, A day at the office, dinner or a formal/semiformal event would be quite fine.
Both have 5 atm water resistance despite the thinness, and unlike ultra thin watches of the past, they can worn daily without any issue at all.
When my thin watch came in, the question why i had collected so many thick watches? Winding my thin watch is not that problem, while the crown stil have enough grip and it is not too micro. The question even more strong why i collected many thick watches. It wear sweet, and one after the other thick watch ran out of power reserve. I question even the need of too manny complications that pump up a watch case. Those brands who go for the most thin movement, it is a good race. But the crown must ga
My tube light just turned on 😀
Here’s my other extreme, a veritable tuna can. 5 Citizens or 3 JLCs would fit in this case, but I like this for other reasons as it is evokes a pocket watch repurposed for the wrist and the diameter to height ratio is just right.
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 46 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →