Tudor Ranger 36mm vs. 39mm Reference Guide
Reference Guide

Tudor Ranger 36mm vs. 39mm Reference Guide

By quattro · Mar 19, 2026 · 16 replies
quattro
WPS member · Rolex forum
16 replies555 views20 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 ✉ 🔗

Emmanuel, known as quattro on WatchProSite, provides an invaluable photo review comparing the Tudor Ranger in its 36mm and 39mm iterations. His detailed visual guide, complete with reference numbers and movement specifications, offers collectors a crucial resource for discerning the subtle yet significant differences between these popular field watch models. This comparative analysis is essential for anyone considering adding a Tudor Ranger to their collection, highlighting the nuances that often dictate a collector's preference.

Just a simple photo review to compare the different models of the Tudor Ranger.

First 36 mm, then 39 mm, then both side by side.

Enjoy!

Best, Emmanuel


A/ 36 mm DIAMETER

BEIGE (“DUNE WHITE”) DIAL: Ref. M79930-0007 (bracelet) & M79930-0008 (fabric strap)

BLACK DIAL: Ref. M79930-0001 (bracelet) & M79930-0003 (fabric strap)

36 x 11 mm steel case, Manufacture Calibre MT5400 (COSC), Waterproof to 100m (330 ft)







Watch by Rolex, M79930-0007, Ranger, Tudor










credit: Monochrome, @watch_girl_life, @perpetual.passion, @champsg & Fratello


B/ 39 mm DIAMETER

BEIGE (“DUNE WHITE”) DIAL: Ref. M79950-0008 (bracelet) & M79950-0011 (fabric strap)

BLACK DIAL: Ref. M79950-0001 (bracelet) & M79950-0003 (fabric strap)

39 x 12 mm steel case, Manufacture Calibre MT5402 (COSC), Waterproof to 100m (330 ft)




credit: juan_j4s & @champsg


Ranger 39 with Oyster Perpetual 41


credit: @juan_j4s




Ranger 39 with Explorer II (42 mm)



Ranger 39 with Black Bay Pro (39 mm)


credit: Hodinkee


C/ 36 & 39 mm SIDE BY SIDE

Ranger 39 (bracelet) with 36 (fabric strap)


credit: @champsg


Ranger 39 (top) with 36 (bottom)


credit: Fratello


Ranger 36 (bracelet) with 39 (fabric strap)





Ranger 36 Black and Beige (bracelet) with 39 (fabric strap)


credit: Monochrome

About the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Jumbo Ref. 5402

The Royal Oak reference 5402 is recognized as the original iteration of the model, introduced in 1972. This reference established the design language that would define the Royal Oak collection, characterized by its integrated bracelet and octagonal bezel secured by visible screws. It was initially presented as a luxury sport watch, distinguishing itself through its material and finishing in a period dominated by more traditional dress watch aesthetics. The 5402 was produced in various series, with the A-series being the earliest and most sought after by collectors.

The watch features a 39mm stainless steel case, often referred to as the "Jumbo" size, which was considered substantial for its era. It houses the self-winding Caliber 2121, a thin movement derived from Jaeger-LeCoultre's Caliber 920, known for its full-rotor design. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 40 hours. The crystal protecting the dial is acrylic, and the watch offers a water resistance of 50 meters, suitable for general wear.

For collectors, the reference 5402 holds significance as the foundational model of a major watch series. Its various production series (A, B, C, D) present nuances in dial text and case back engravings that are closely examined. The integrated steel bracelet is an integral part of its design, contributing to its distinct profile. The blue dial, often with a "tapisserie" pattern, is a hallmark of this early reference, though other dial variations exist.

Specifications

Caliber
2121
Case
Stainless steel
Diameter
39 mm
Dial
Blue
Water Resist.
50m
Crystal
Acrylic

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
BR
bruckner4
Mar 20, 2026

Wouldn't mind adding a 36mm beige one of these days. Thanks for the photo montage!

AR
Arronax
Mar 20, 2026

Lots of very likeable models in the line up, that being said every time I check one I realize I already have a similar watch in my modest collection and inevitably reach the conclusion that I don't need one. Only exception would be the gmt as I don't have one.

QU
quattro
Mar 20, 2026

and 36 seems to be a good size (not too much empty space on the dial). Best, Emmanuel

QU
quattro
Mar 20, 2026

I guess, but I wonder if 36 isn’t even better in terms of “empty space” on the dial. Best, Emmanuel

QU
quattro
Mar 20, 2026

I have a BB36, though, so this space is already taken in my collection. Best, Emmanuel

QU
quattro
Mar 20, 2026

so I guess most of us already have a watch which fills this space. What I regret about these watches is their thickness: why 11 mm for a 36? It should be below 10 for me. And the GMT is 12.8 mm: way too thick, imo. Best, Emmanuel Black Bay Pro is even 14.6 mm…

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 16 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →