Vintage
Bill's pictorial review of the Tudor Monte Carlo ref. 7159/0 highlights a vintage chronograph that, despite its initial underappreciation, has become a significant collector's item. His post delves into the unique characteristics and challenges of finding pristine examples, offering valuable insights for enthusiasts considering this distinctive timepiece. Bill's work, inspired by fellow collector Jeff "DrStrong," showcases the watch's robust presence and unique aesthetic.
The Tudor Chronograph reference 7159 is part of the second generation of Tudor chronographs, often referred to as the "Monte Carlo" series due to its distinctive dial aesthetics. This reference, introduced in the early 1970s, represents a significant evolution from the earlier 703x series, incorporating design updates while retaining the robust and functional character of Tudor's sports watches. It is distinguished by its specific bezel type and dial configurations, setting it apart from its siblings within the 71xx series.
This particular reference features a stainless steel case, typically measuring 40mm in diameter, providing a substantial presence on the wrist. It houses a manually wound Valjoux 234 movement, known for its reliability and chronograph functionality. The watch is fitted with an acrylic crystal, consistent with sports watches of its era, offering durability and a classic profile. The case construction ensures a degree of water resistance suitable for its intended use as a versatile tool watch.
For collectors, the 7159 is a sought-after reference within the vintage Tudor chronograph lineage. Its appeal lies in its distinctive design elements, including the vibrant dial colors and the specific tachymeter bezel. It represents a key period in Tudor's history, showcasing the brand's independent design direction while leveraging Rolex's manufacturing quality. The various dial and bezel combinations within the 71xx series offer collectors a range of options.
.Definitely, these MCs deserve much more appreciation and love. Their thciker case, compared to the vintage Dayto, is an asset, as you said it very well. A Vintage Dayto and a Tudor MC, that is something to consider. I would sound like an heretic, but I must say that I much prefer these MCs with their ss bezel than with their plastic. Now the question remains: Which one? Yours is superb, but I also feel some strong love for the 7031. Both would be ideal! Congratulations, my friend. Another one I
The quest for a 7031 "Home Plate". Yes that would be nice too. But as you noted this is a good one to accompany any Daytona. This watch can fill the gap of a PN with a lot less effort. In no way a replacement but a good alternative with the painted dial and strong graphic presence. Thanks again. A+ Bill
..."A Vintage Dayto and a Tudor MC, that is something to consider"
I am still a long way behind you my friend. Still taking baby steps. The waters can be treacherous in the Paul Newman world and mistakes can be very costly. I think it takes a very seasoned connoisseur to be able to make correct judgment about a PN Daytona. We see many but…. Too many surprises. Best A+ Bill
...and it adds to the thrill ;-)
No message body
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 43 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
