Tudor Chronograph vs. GMT: Which to Choose?
Discussion

Tudor Chronograph vs. GMT: Which to Choose?

By singingbee · Oct 11, 2018 · 29 replies
singingbee
WPS member · Rolex forum
29 replies5957 views8 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 ✉ 🔗

Singingbee seeks community advice on a significant acquisition, torn between the Tudor Heritage Chrono Blue, the Black Bay Chrono, and the Black Bay GMT. His post outlines key criteria for his next watch—high water resistance, bracelet, durability for weekend wear, and versatility—and provides personal pros and cons for each model. The inclusion of wristshots offers valuable context for readers to weigh in on his dilemma.

29 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
I am in abit of a dilemma now. Have always wanted to add a chronograph to my collection as it is something which I sorely lacks.

I have done some research and have shortlisted the Tudor Heritage Chrono Blue and the BB Chrono. Reasons for choosing them are:

1) Higher WR
2) Bracelet
3) Tough for weekend playtime
4) Versatile enough for very casual wear and office attires
5) Looks good and fun to wear

I was originally leaning towards the Heritage Chrono Blue but after trying my friend’s new BB Chrono, I feel it fits quite well on my wrist too and looks quite versatile.

Plus it has an “in-house” movement of 70 hours vs the 42 hours of the ETA 2894 on the Heritage Chrono. Downside is I feel the sub dials on the BB Chrono looks too small and the date window doesn’t gel very well with the rest of the dial.

To make thing slightly complicated, I also come into contact with the BB GMT recently and this is a watch which grows on me the more I see it and read about it. To be honest I didn’t care much about it initially as I was of the view that it is a poor man version of its Rolex counterpart. Now I feel differently as I feel it has its own merit that makes me want to own it. It is Tudor’s first GMT and it’s a Pepsi. It also sports Tudor’s first in-house GMT movement. Although value retention is not my priority in this purchase, I suspect the GMT will be the only one that will hold or retain its value.

It fulfils my above requirements except it is not a chronograph. However it is also a genre of watch which I do not own in my admittedly small collection.

Below are the pics of the three watches on my wrist. Which one do you think I should get?












Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
WA
Walter2
Oct 11, 2018
For me BB Chrono. [nt]

JA
jayeyedoubleemmwhy
Oct 11, 2018
BB Chrono for me too

It’s a much more interesting (and modern) movement. Long power reserve, column wheel, vertical clutch, supposedly designed by the engineers that also helped make Rolex’s Daytona calibre (albeit for Breitling). The black dial w/ steel case is a very safe combo and will look good in most situations.

JA
jayeyedoubleemmwhy
Oct 11, 2018
One more thought

Also, it was designed with a focus on repairability, so it has some features that I think contributed to Tudor’s decision to use it; auto-centering of chrono parts, partially modular design, etc.

SI
singingbee
Oct 14, 2018
No doubt, the movement of the BB Chrono is technically better and more interesting than the THC. I would love to have the 70 hours PR too. [nt]

PE
Peevee57
Oct 11, 2018
Another vote for the chrono

Don’t think you’ll ever get bored of it, classic design.

VM
VMM
Oct 11, 2018
Among those three, BB Chrono for me. [nt]

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 29 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →