Seiko SJE093 62MAS Re-Edition Prospex Diver

Mach · 2023-07-04T18:28:16Z

Seiko reissues the 62MAS diver as the SJE093, a limited edition of 1965 pieces. See details, photos, and community reactions to this Prospex release.

Mach announces the Seiko SJE093, a new re-edition of the iconic 62MAS diver, limited to 1965 pieces. This post provides an initial overview of the watch, including its design cues, packaging, and pricing, inviting community discussion on Seiko's ongoing strategy of reissuing heritage models. The release sparks conversation about the evolution of Seiko's Prospex line.

Surprise . . . Another Re-Edition of the 62MAS in a LE run of 1965 pieces due to be released in August:

** Photos courtesy of Monochrome’s IG post **

Wasn’t easy to find, but it’s on Seiko’s site:

https://www.seikowatches.com/global-en/products/prospex/sje093j1

The pieces will be issued in boxes similar to the original:

https://www.seikowatches.com/au-en/news/20230704

Price: €3700

What are people’s thoughts?

Key Points from the Discussion

The SJE093 offers proportions closer to the original 62MAS compared to previous reissues like the SLA017, providing collectors with a new option in high-end 62MAS re-editions, with pricing adjusted for current market values.
There is a debate among collectors regarding the industry's trend of fluctuating watch sizes, with some expressing frustration over the lack of choice for smaller wrists and the perceived 'fashion-driven' nature of size trends.
Some collectors are tired of the constant reissues and changing size trends, viewing it as a tiresome marketing strategy rather than a genuine evolution of watchmaking.
Cazalea suggests that Seiko's strategy of limited editions and reissues, followed by new homages years later, is a deliberate cycle, noting that the aftermarket often tracks Seiko's product lines more closely than the company itself.
A contributor expresses confusion about Seiko's product strategy, arguing that a timepiece like the SJE093 should be part of the regular catalog rather than a limited edition, given the lack of clarity in the brand's direction.
One collector states they prioritize personal interest over fashion trends in watch buying, indicating a resistance to industry-driven 'fads' in watch sizes and styles.

The Discussion

cazalea

Jul 4, 2023

Not all parts of the PR machine operate on a 24/7 basis; likewise those of us in the “semi-media”. But no worries, in a month or two we’ll see them in stores. I like it too. Cazalea

andrea~

Jul 4, 2023

It has strong competition from Tudor though. I'm sure it will sell out regardless.

Mach

Jul 4, 2023

I just saw the SLA043 at an AD about an hour ago!

RabidManatee

Jul 4, 2023

Not to mention Seiko has at least one other watch which shares this design in its current lineup. It seems like Grand Seiko’s marketing team has taken over; that’s not a compliment (for the record I have and happen to be wearing a GS).

cazalea

Jul 4, 2023

Make so many (+ percentage for warranty spares). STOP. Go onto the next one. A couple 3-5-10 years later start on another homage to tradition. Make some. STOP. Repeat the cycle. I was once quietly informed by a knowledgeable source that the aftermarket (that be us) keep better track of Seiko's product lines than they do inside the company. Don't take it personally. Not every company makes a Submariner for decades... though the Snowflake might be an exception to GS's rule of "keep changing" Cheer

gregcarraram3

Jul 5, 2023

But, I am tired of the industry trying to force small sizes on me...just my opinion, but it has gone the way of the fashion industry...small watch, big watch, skinny watch, fat watch...kind of like ties and lapels...so tiresome for me...men wearing women’s watches, the new rage...the stupid waiting lists, artificial shortages, those aren’t enough, right? Gotta come up with new content, right? I liked it better when it was a fun hobby or fun interest for me, instead of reading how perfect 37mm is

Seiko SJE093 62MAS Re-Edition Prospex Diver

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

More from this Forum