Rolex Daytona 16520 vs. Modern Precious Metal
Collection

Rolex Daytona 16520 vs. Modern Precious Metal

By Jay (Eire) · Nov 19, 2019 · 24 replies
Jay (Eire)
WPS member · Rolex forum
24 replies5874 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 ✉ 🔗

So, there’s a choice today. You can have one of these, 16520, steel case with either the black or white dial OR you could have a modern precious metal (not PT) Daytona. What do you do? And a second question, if you already had the below watch would you add the white dial (a nice pair) or take a walk

24 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
So, there’s a choice today.  You can have one of these, 16520, steel case with either the black or white dial OR you could have a modern precious metal (not PT) Daytona. 

What do you do?

And a second question, if you already had the below watch would you add the white dial (a nice pair) or take a walk on the wild side with a current generation WG or RG Daytona? 



About the Rolex Ref. 16520

The Rolex Cellini reference 16520 is a notable example of the brand's dress watch offerings, distinct from its more robust sport models. This particular reference represents a period where Rolex explored more refined and understated designs, catering to a clientele seeking a timepiece suitable for formal occasions. It stands as a testament to Rolex's versatility in watchmaking, showcasing a different facet of their design philosophy compared to their Oyster Perpetual line.

This reference features a case crafted from stainless steel, measuring 40mm in diameter. It is equipped with an automatic movement, specifically the Caliber 4030, which is based on the Zenith El Primero. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 50 hours. A sapphire crystal protects the dial, and the watch is rated for a water resistance of 100 meters. The fixed tachymeter bezel is a characteristic feature.

For collectors, the reference 16520 appeals to those interested in the evolution of Rolex's dress watch designs and their use of external base movements. Its production run from 1988 to 2000 places it within a specific era of Rolex manufacturing. The black dial and Oyster bracelet contribute to its overall aesthetic, making it a recognizable piece within the Cellini collection.

Specifications

Caliber
Cal. 4030 (Zenith El Primero based)
Case
stainless steel
Diameter
40mm
Dial
black
Water Resist.
100m
Crystal
Sapphire
Advertisement
The Discussion
U3
U3O8
Nov 19, 2019

I have the SS 116520 White and Black dial pair. So I may be a little biased.

EU
Euroasianstar
Nov 19, 2019

The 16520 Zenith and the new ceramic bezel Daytona in steel. As I get a bit older I find the legibility of the white dials a bit better. Given where pricing and value sits today, I’ve been tempted to cash in and get myself another PP or FPJ time only piece, but then hold back because there should be a Daytona in a watch collection. If anything can hold its value with a chance of appreciation...it’s the Daytona.

SA
Saxon
Nov 19, 2019

16520 A-series But to be honest: i could not decide between black or white dial

VM
VMM
Nov 19, 2019

The white 16520 is still one of the best looking Daytonas ever, for me. If you ask me about modern Daytonas, the WG Oysterflex has no rival. Vte

JA
Jay (Eire)
Nov 20, 2019

Overall, I think the WG is the best looking of the bunch, and most versatile. However, the Oysterflex also allows one to go coloured gold while still not catching everyone’s eyes.

JA
Jay (Eire)
Nov 20, 2019

This is the current “this or that” dilemma.

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →