Rolex Cellini Moonphase: Collector Thoughts

singingbee · 2022-12-13T11:42:04Z

Explore the Rolex Cellini Moonphase: a deep dive into its unique design, 'un-Rolex' identity, and collector opinions on its thickness, movement, and aesthetic appeal.

singingbee

WPS member · Rolex forum

26 replies5891 views0 photos

Rolex's Cellini Moonphase, a distinctive departure from the brand's sports watch dominance, continues to spark debate among collectors. Author 'singingbee' revisits this unique reference, initially finding it too thick but now appreciating its aesthetic. This article delves into the community's nuanced perspectives on its design, perceived 'un-Rolex' identity, and horological significance.

26 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

The last time I saw this watch in the metal was back in 2017 when it was just launched. I recalled I didn’t find it very attractive as I find the watch abit too thick and chunky as a dress watch.

I recently saw it on display at my local AD and I find the dial, fluted bezel and meteorite moonphase quite nice. The whole package in a 39mm Everose gold case looks very appealing to me although I still have my reservation on the thickness, 13+mm if I remember correctly. I feel the thickness here detracts from the overall elegance of this beautiful piece.

The AD also told me the moonphase is the only model remaining in the Cellini family as the other models have been discontinued.

Key Points from the Discussion

The Cellini Moonphase is a beautiful and distinctive piece, often misunderstood for being 'un-Rolex' due to its dress watch aesthetic, despite embodying Rolex's core values of robustness and excellent timekeeping in a unique package.
The watch features a unique pebble-like curved case, fluted bezel and caseback, and one of the most beautiful moonphase displays available. Its design creates a tension between sporty and dressy, akin to an AP Code.
While some perceive the solid case back and industrial caliber as negatives, these align with Rolex's philosophy of creating reliable movements and comfortable cases. The dial and case refinement are exceptional for its price point.
The seconds hand length is appropriate as the minute/second track is relocated towards the inner dial due to the calendar on the outer rim, preventing confusion and allowing for precise reading.
The Cellini Moonphase is not as thick as it might appear, and its 'un-Rolex' identity is a recurring theme in discussions.
The watch's availability makes it less desirable for some collectors, who also express a desire for a white gold version.

The Discussion

@lberti

Dec 13, 2022

I have always liked it... very beautiful piece in a decent size 👍

singingbee

Dec 18, 2022

Same sentiments on this!

Uncle Chico

Dec 13, 2022

For me it is the UnRolex (meant as a compliment.) I have the Time Only model and it is my most "serious" watch. The Moon Phase is certainly more eye-catching.

Dec 13, 2022

I almost got one

But it was not available in Sydney, and so I passed on it. Recalled calling up every single AD to ask if they had one. Many months after I saw one sitting in the store and asked to see it (wallet empty). It was a painful moment.

singingbee

Dec 18, 2022

I got the chance to get it when it was first launched too.

Nowadays there appears to be a long queue for it, at least according to my local ADs.

Dec 18, 2022

I believe so too

I did see one unusual version, the time only Cellini, but studded with diamonds, at the AD at that time. It is not on the catalogue.

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 26 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →

Rolex Cellini Moonphase: Collector Thoughts

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

Related Articles