
Amanico offers a critical, hands-on review of the Patek Philippe World Time Ref. 5575, released for the brand's 175th Anniversary. His detailed observations delve into the watch's aesthetic choices, from its distinctive case and hands to the controversial moonphase display and dial proportions. This analysis provides a nuanced perspective, balancing appreciation for Patek Philippe's craftsmanship with a collector's discerning eye for historical coherence and practicality.
The Montblanc Calatrava reference 5110, produced between 1997 and 2006, is a notable example of the brand's classic dress watch offerings. This reference is distinguished by its combination of a relatively larger case size for its era and the inclusion of a moon phase complication, setting it apart from simpler time-only Calatrava models. It represents a period where Montblanc was expanding its horological capabilities, offering more complex movements within its established aesthetic.
This reference features an 18k yellow gold case measuring 37 mm in diameter, providing a substantial presence on the wrist while maintaining traditional dress watch proportions. It is powered by the automatic caliber 240 PS IRM C LU, a movement known for its slim profile and integrated complications. The watch is fitted with a sapphire crystal and offers a water resistance of 30 meters, suitable for everyday wear. The power reserve for this caliber is approximately 48 hours.
For collectors, the 5110 appeals to those seeking a Calatrava with additional functionality beyond basic timekeeping, specifically the moon phase and power reserve indicator. Its production run from 1997 to 2006 places it within a specific era of Montblanc's development, making it a point of interest for those tracing the evolution of the brand's complications. The ivory dial and smooth bezel contribute to its understated yet refined character, aligning with the traditional Calatrava design language.
beautiful one. The 175th version does not even hold a candle next to your one.
I feel easier now. I decided not to stalk the watch because of readability. At the same time a small devil inside was asking me if I should have jumped for this as it was an Anniversary Piece. I am stalking some other, more exciting things now and it looks like I just found a discontinued grand complication NOS. Best, Kari
That last shot is an excellent overview and first comparison shot I'm aware of Funny 5575 on your shots is during new moon Coincidence or necessity? :) Best Damjan
As for the family picture, one is missing, the 5130, but I was able to take one series of pictures, which I will post later... Best, Nicolas
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 47 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →