Patek Philippe World Time 5110 vs. 5130 Comparison

amanico · 2009-04-21T12:47:59Z

Compare Patek Philippe World Time references 5110 and 5130. Explore dial, size, and design differences with macro photos. Which is your favorite?

amanico

WPS member · Patek Philippe forum

115 replies77944 views0 photos

Amanico initiates a compelling comparison between two modern Patek Philippe World Time references, the 5110 and the 5130. His detailed macro photography and insightful analysis delve into the subtle yet significant differences in their dial layouts, finishes, and overall aesthetics, prompting a lively debate among collectors about which reference reigns supreme.

I managed to take some decent macros of these 2 modern PP World Time, which are, IMO, the nicest World Time of the actual production.

The question is what is the most desirable between these 2 references...

Well, it's not about the movement, as the Caliber 240 is common to both watches.

Here, in the 5130:

There, in the 5110:

Even in the 5130 ( with a 2 mm bigger case ), the movement is not lost, and there is no inconvenient to see it in a bigger watch.

So, what would be the criteria that would make you go on one rather than on another?

1/ The size, IMO, has an important impact on the dial.

With its 37mm, the layout of the dial of the 5110 is maybe a bit more coherent, if you look at the center part, which has harmonious proportions with the outside part, where the name of the Cities of the world is written.

Here, the press files pic of the 5110:

There, the press files pic of the 5130:

2/ The layout and finish of the dials :

The differences are huge, here.

A precious Guillochage, or a simpler, but elegant Sunburst Dial ?

The 5110:

Now, let's have some macros of the 5130:

As you can see, the differences are so obvious that the watches seem to have a distinct personnality.

The 5110 is a jewel, with an impressive finish of the dial.

The Guillochage is precious, the proportions of the 2 parts of the dial are harmonious, even the hands are sublime, IMO.

The 5130 has superb cissors hands ( the Hour Hand, to be more precise ), and I'd like to see them on the 5110, which would be the perfect World Time, for me.

The indexes are triangulars, while those of the 5110 are rectangular, detail that I didn't notice before these macros.

The 5130 has maybe a more modern look, with its sunburst dial, less precious, and looks more easily wearable for an average sized wrist, with its 39mm diameter.

But what you gain in modernity, you loose in harmony, specially when you look at the center and outside part of the dial, which is, for me at least, its bigger problem.

Actually, I love them both, because of their differences.

And you, what are your thoughts?

But never forget...

Have a good reading.

Nicolas This message has been edited by amanico on 2009-04-21 12:49:02 This message has been edited by Dje on 2009-04-25 11:19:14

About the Patek Philippe Ref. 5130

The Patek Philippe Complications reference 5130, introduced in 2006, is a World Time watch that succeeded the popular reference 5110. This model maintained the distinctive World Time complication, allowing for simultaneous display of time in 24 different time zones. Its design evolved with a slightly larger case and updated dial aesthetics, distinguishing it from its predecessor while retaining the core functionality that defines Patek Philippe's travel timepieces. It was produced until 2017.

The watch features an 18k rose gold case measuring 39.5mm in diameter and 9.8mm in thickness, housing the self-winding Caliber 240 HU movement. This ultra-thin movement, visible through a sapphire crystal case back, provides a power reserve of 48 hours. The dial is silver or opaline with a guilloché center, protected by a sapphire crystal. Water resistance is rated at 30 meters.

Reference 5130 appeals to collectors seeking a sophisticated travel complication from Patek Philippe. Its larger case size compared to the 5110 offered a more contemporary presence on the wrist, while its classic World Time mechanism remained a hallmark of the brand's technical prowess. The model was available in various precious metals, with the rose gold variant offering a warm aesthetic.

Specifications

Caliber: Cal.240 HU

Case: 18k rose gold

Diameter: 39.5mm

Dial: Silver / opaline guilloché

Water Resist.: 30m

Crystal: Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

The 5110 is preferred for its guilloché dial, harmonious proportions, and rectangular indexes, while the 5130's larger size is appreciated, but its unchanged center dial in relation to the outer ring is seen as a drawback.
While the 5110 is acknowledged as beautiful, its smaller size makes it unsuitable for some wrists. The 5130's scissor hour hand is a standout feature, reminiscent of vintage World Time models.
The 5130's larger dial offers better legibility due to more spacious country names and its scissor hour hand is easier to distinguish. The lighter, sunburst dial of the 5130 is also seen as more open and modern compared to the 5110's guilloché.
Preference between the 5110 and 5130 varies by metal; the 5110 in yellow gold is favored, while the 5130 in white gold (due to blue numbers and strap) and rose gold (despite preferring 5110 hands) is slightly preferred.
A collector with impaired vision finds the 5110's hands difficult to distinguish, especially in low light, making the 5130's scissor hands more practical for legibility.
One collector traded a 5110P for a 5130P, expressing greater satisfaction with the 5130P, indicating that personal preference often outweighs perceived collector value or market trends.

The Discussion

small-luxury-world

Apr 21, 2009

of the Guillochage. The Sunburst Dial doesn´t do it for me. Only the feeling of the pusher kept me away (so far) to get one. It was my first impression when I handled it and still can´t forget it. Always have to try it, when I get one in my hands ... :-( ... but it is so beautiful ... Oliver

Bruno.M1

Apr 21, 2009

to start, the extra 2 mm is very important to me ! Concerning the dial, I'm not a big fan of guilloché dials and I love the hour hand of the 5130

polarbear1990

Apr 21, 2009

...plus, I like to travel "light"... I assume the 5110 weighs in at a bit less than the 5130 :^)

Chris Meisenzahl

Apr 21, 2009

Great post. Patek makes the best true worldtimer, tradition and innovation. I like 5130, but love 5110!

patrick_y

Apr 21, 2009

I love all the Patek Worldtimers, especially because they have the 240 caliber movement which exhibits a very high degree of finishing. However, in different metals, I prefer different world timers... Yellow gold; I've only seen it in the 5110 and not 5130. They don't make a 5130 in yellow gold yet except as the 5131 which is another story. The 5110 in yellow gold is beautiful, and can be matched to a glossy black strap, matte black strap, and matt brown strap. White Gold; I prefer the 5130 by a

cmclee

Apr 22, 2009

Finally decided on the 5130g. Personally I feel that the cities are a bit cramp for 5110 and also the hands are a bit short thus affecting its legibility. I like the 5130 scissor hands as it resembles the vintage worldtimer and overall more readible. The size did not affect me much as both sits well on my wrist. Conclusion , for aesthetics, the 5110, for practicality, the 5130. But both are very nice. Cheers !

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 115 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →

Patek Philippe World Time 5110 vs. 5130 Comparison

About the Patek Philippe Ref. 5130

Specifications

About the Patek Philippe Annual Calendar Ref. 5110

Specifications

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

More from this Forum