
Thomas_3's post ignited a fascinating discussion about the unwritten rules of luxury watch collecting, particularly concerning Patek Philippe's most exclusive timepieces. His initial observation regarding the Stern family's reported displeasure over Sylvester Stallone's sale of a factory-sealed Grand Master Chime delves into the delicate balance between brand control and owner autonomy. This thread explores the implications of such a high-profile transaction on Patek Philippe's stringent sales policies and the broader collector community.

all watches must be sold unsealed. Hence, either the AD misbehaved or Sly got his watch somehow resealed elsewhere. This is a very complicated matter given Sly's status in the world.
I always thought that since 2015 or 2016 all Patek sold had to be removed from their plastic seal before the client takes possession of it. I am therefore surprised that Sly's Grandmaster Chime remained in its original sealed plastic packaging. Patek should therefore investigate this more thoroughly and if anyone is to be blamed, it should be the authorised dealer for not following Patek;s guidelines. But the truth is that the watch belonged to Sly, he had kept it for three years and he had ever
Looks like Sylvester Stalloneโs relationship with Patek just got rocky.
...For public consumption, "Isn't it terrible that someone on the list didn't get theirs." In private they are thrilled because it will get a very good price.
Remove all the plastic.
that I can see or understand. If I'm in line for that kinda watch buying it off Stallone for an extra 2mil would be nothing when the value of Stallone's name alone will be incalculable later.
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 37 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →