Reference Guide
mstanga, a respected Patek Philippe collector, delves into a subtle yet significant detail within the Nautilus ref. 5712: the evolution of its power reserve indicator. His meticulous observation highlights how even seemingly minor changes can distinguish different production eras of a highly sought-after reference, offering invaluable insights for collectors and enthusiasts tracking Patek Philippe's continuous refinements.
Please tell me the truth, did you know it?
The Patek Philippe Complications Reference 5712 is a notable offering within the brand's Complications collection, distinguished by its asymmetrical dial layout and a suite of practical indications. It presents a sophisticated blend of functionality and design, offering a moon phase, power reserve indicator, and an analog date display, all arranged to create a distinctive visual identity that sets it apart from more traditional Patek Philippe designs.
This particular reference features a stainless steel case measuring 40 mm in diameter, housing the self-winding caliber 240 PS IRM C LU. This movement is known for its slim profile, achieved through the integration of a micro-rotor, contributing to the watch's comfortable wearability. The watch is fitted with a sapphire crystal and offers a water resistance of 60 meters, with a power reserve of approximately 48 hours.
For collectors, the 5712 represents an accessible entry into Patek Philippe's complicated timepieces, offering a range of functions without the complexity of a perpetual calendar or chronograph. Its stainless steel construction and integrated bracelet provide a robust and versatile option, appealing to those seeking a daily wearable complicated watch. The reference has been in production since 2006, with the 5712/1A denoting the stainless steel bracelet variant.
Much appreciated. Cheers. Geross.
I don't know the significance but I prefer one dot as oppose the two dots. Best Regards Edward
When me and 2 of my best watch buddies owned 5712/1A at the same time we compared them side by side and there are differences, as what you've mentioned here. If I'm not mistaken that time was a 2006 , 2010 and 2013 piece. A have slight difference in dial color. And there was a small difference in moonphase finish, one being polished and other being matte. I still need to find the photo I took before, let's see if I can find it Thanks again for such a great reference point post Marco! Sam
Thank you for another interesting post about subtle differences within the same reference! Itβs fascinating how these small changes go in over time. Not a nautilus, but other references also has these small differences. Below is my 5127 with 57 dots around the dial on the left, but newer runs of the 5127 has 60 dots around the dial (note there are 3 more on the date window). The newer 5127βs also use the 324 movement, as opposed to the the old ones that has the 315 movement. I wonder if there ar
Ecco la differenza del disco "fasi lunari", tra la prima versione e la successiva; Il dot al 48 Γ¨ stato aggiunto per una modifica al bariletto, che nelle prime versioni poteva dare qualche problema: il modello con 2 dot ha un nuovo bariletto con riserva di carica di circa 52 ore.
which I like best. The 315 model seems smaller to me overall, also.
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 16 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
