
Miranda's original post sparked a vibrant discussion by presenting a visual size comparison between the Patek Philippe Cubitus and the iconic Nautilus. Her initial observation, featuring Hodinkee's imagery, served as a crucial catalyst for collectors to weigh in on Patek Philippe's strategic direction and design philosophy, particularly concerning the introduction of new lines and their relationship to established classics. This article synthesizes the community's diverse perspectives on the Cubitus's design, market positioning, and potential impact on the brand's legacy.

The Patek Philippe Complications reference 5711/1A is a specific configuration within the Complications model line. This particular reference is identified by its serial number 5914840, with a movement number 6084863.
The watch is presented in a stainless steel case, indicated by the "/1A" suffix. No specific details regarding the crystal material or movement architecture are provided.
This reference appeals to collectors seeking a Patek Philippe Complications model in stainless steel. Its specific serial and movement numbers are documented for identification purposes.
Very similar.
If we had a quartz Nautilus... we could probably match supply with demand... at staggering margins. The dreaded watchmaker is not needed (nearly) and the desperate SS customer gets something that says Patek on it for his golf buddies to glance at... haha... the models WITHOUT the big date aren't really quite so ugly as the one WITH... but yeah, this oozes cynicism... and I think--again--this provides the fulfillment of a MAN'S SS watch that does not require a human as much to make.
Don't forget the quick change bracelet/strap.
for the simple reason, I am used to the finishing and quality of the AP Royal Oak from the 70s, 90s and 2000s, I like tool watches too, where the finishing is not the raison d'etre. So I did keep that in mind when I went to buy it but couldn't pull the trigger when I had it on my wrist. Maybe if the bezel of the two tone Santos I was interested in was a brushed finish vs. shiny or the quality of the dial would be better could have convinced me. I have noticed on the higher end pieces the finish
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 60 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →