Patek Philippe Cubitus 40mm: Hands-On Review
Reference Guide

Patek Philippe Cubitus 40mm: Hands-On Review

By quattro · Nov 16, 2025 · 41 replies
quattro
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
41 replies2795 views7 photos
f 𝕏 in πŸ’¬ βœ‰ πŸ”—

Emmanuel, known as 'quattro' on WatchProSite, offers a compelling hands-on review of the Patek Philippe 40mm rose gold Cubitus, reference 7128/1R-001. His detailed impressions, particularly on its wearability and design nuances, provide invaluable insights for collectors considering this polarizing reference. This article delves into Emmanuel's personal experience and synthesizes the community's diverse reactions to Patek Philippe's modern take on a shaped watch.

41 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Last August, I was able to try on the rose gold 40 mm Cubitus, ref. 7128/1R-001.

On a small 16 cm wrist like mine, the size feels good and the sunburst brown dial is really appealing



The 8.5 mm thickness and the very refined construction and finishing of the case make for a very pleasing experience on the wrist.





I'm still not exactly sure why the Cubitus was introduced, but, as someone who likes shaped watches, I'm glad that the square shape is being rehabilitated in a fairly original way with this watch (by β€œoriginal” I mean octagonal).





Before trying on the Golden Ellipse ref. 5738/1R-001 last February in Geneva, I would never have thought I could be attracted to a full gold bracelet watch


So, I think that if the Cubitus had a less sporty-chic and nautilus-like design, I could be attracted to it.





That said, even if the Golden Ellipse speaks more to my taste and sensibility, the Cubitus is appealing as it is.





My only real dislike or disappointment concerns the movement, caliber 26-330 S C: not only is it not shaped (such a lost opportunity), but I don't respond at all to the horizontal motif decorating the rotor because it emphasises the sport-chic identity of the watch.

NB: the bracelet features a lockable adjustment system.









Thanks for reading.

Best, Emmanuel 

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
KM
KMII
Nov 16, 2025
Looks good on your wrist πŸ˜ŠπŸ‘πŸ»

Not exactly my style and as much as I appreciate the attempt of introducing more shaped watches that will likely sell, I cannot but feel that it’s a low effort and low cost attempt at doing so - recycle as many design elements of the Nautilus as possible, no investment in a shaped movement… Sure the fit and finish will have the usual PP care and attention but I feel it could have been more. In that sense I also feel the Golden Ellipse would suit your style better πŸ‘ŒπŸ»πŸ‘πŸ» The spoof advert for the Cu

QU
quattro
Nov 16, 2025
I completely agree with you:

it’s a poor attempt with a lot of recycling. But if you forget about the Nautilus and consider the watch in itself, it’s far from unappealing though disappointing as far as the movement is concerned. Best, Emmanuel

KM
KMII
Nov 16, 2025
I am sure there will be many satisfied owners πŸ˜ŠπŸ‘πŸ»

And like you say, if the Nautilus didn’t exist there are quite some appealing aspects to it. But a shaped movement would definitely have been in order πŸ‘πŸ»

QU
quattro
Nov 16, 2025
It would definitely make this piece very attractive!

KM
KMII
Nov 16, 2025
I think a bespoke shaped movement would also result in much less criticism of the Nautilus derived design codes πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ

MC
MCG (Markus)
Nov 16, 2025
I do not agree, but of course it is only my opion.

The Nautilus is/was a refined shape, and the ears make sense! Vice versa here they are clumsy and meke no sense for this shape. I agree to KMII, low effort from a non-designer to create something new with the elements that were/are successful. A pity for the brand, the model and the reputation of it… πŸ€·πŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 41 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →