
Andrea~'s original post ignited a passionate discussion among WatchProSite members, delving into the implications of Thierry Stern's recent remarks and their potential impact on Patek Philippe's brand image. This article explores how the community grappled with the perceived disconnect between the brand's heritage and its current communication strategy, particularly concerning new releases like the Cubitus.

Public relations consultants who could explain to this fellow just how damaging to Patek the tone of his remark is.
The brand was phenomenal in the 20th century. So many classics, so many beautiful watches. The brand was the peak of class and sophistication. Can we really say the same now? I don't think so.
Doesnt mean what they produce isnt ugly or tasteless. They are not immune to hate or criticism. He was supposed to decrease nautilus production but comes up with another even uglier nautilus.
Plus there's nothing that screams "classless spoiled brat" more than attacking potential customers for criticizing a badly designed 40k $ steel watch.
… about the “never will” quote than he knows 🤣. This just made the cocktail party a little more interesting.
I suspect the numbers will be acceptable and the demographic will skew towards a younger collector.
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 113 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →