
In a captivating post, joenghenry shares an intimate look at a Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar, sparking a discussion about the evolution of collector preferences. His close-up photography highlights the watch's intricate details, inviting the community to reflect on design choices and the enduring appeal of classic complications. This thread offers valuable insights into how tastes shift within the Patek Philippe collecting landscape.


...and I am not even a big fan of the other Nautili...this one is a keeper : )
Nice watch but personally prefer this movement where it should be, in a 3940 π Few funny observations; people used to say to me, I donβt like 3940 as no seconds hand.. no one complains when itβs in a Nautilus case itβs kind of funny as when I bought the white annual calendar Nautilus 5726/1A everyone told me annual calendar has no place in a sports watch and it was sitting in the window with no takers.. Changed days and changing tastes I guess haha.
I previously also preferred PC with a second hand (eg 5159 retrograde), but as my age and experience in watch collection grow, start to appreciate the charm of ultra thin and traditional PC of 3940/ 5140. Guess second hand is not that essential when the watch is designed to keep track of time in a four years cycle Cheers, Henry
Nothing comparable to those professional macro π
are getting good ! π Love the 5740G
...and it is fantastic! The core of any collection : )
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 20 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →