Discussion
Jim14, a Patek Philippe 5205G-013 owner, explores the often-debated topic of deployant buckle comfort and fitment. His inquiry into swapping his watch's original pin buckle for a Calatrava logo deployant buckle sparks a robust discussion among collectors, offering valuable insights into personal preferences, strap considerations, and the practicalities of Patek Philippe's deployant system. This article synthesizes the community's diverse experiences to help readers make informed decisions about their own Patek Philippe timepieces.
I swapped the Patek deployant out for a tang buckle, but I almost never like deployants, so that’s my own strong preference. I also prefer the less dressy look of the pin buckle, even on a watch like the 5205. YMMV, of course. Cheers, John
I also have a 5205G with the tang buckle along with a PCC with the usual deployment. I prefer the tang buckle for comfort but do appreciate the style of the deployment, although I might find it annoying on a day-to-day watch.
… and it appears that I could get a decent Speedmaster for what the deployant costs!
I’ve owned that exact deployant and can’t recommend it. Never sat right, destabilized the watch.
I had to buy a tank buckle. In fact, I prefer the buckles most of the time. In the end, it is even safer.
Regarding the specific question of whether a new strap will be required; my guess would be yes; Due to the rather long size of the Patek déployant, and in order to have it fit nicely and flush on the wrist a new strap will likely be necessary, possibly with its short side shorter. Also might be needed to swap between 6 o’clock and 12 o’clock. Recently added new brown ostrich strap from CF for my 5146P: The first attempt worked length wise, was fine with a tang buckle but the déployant was diggin
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
