Collection
Pretty Boy's initial post on the Patek Philippe 5990/1A-001 and 5726/1A-014 sparked a lively discussion among collectors, delving into the nuances of these highly sought-after Nautilus references. His personal preference for these models, particularly the 5990/1A-001, provides a valuable starting point for understanding their appeal and the specific design elements that resonate with enthusiasts. This article synthesizes the community's perspectives on the 5990/1A-001's design, functionality, and overall wearability.
The Patek Philippe Nautilus reference 5726/1A-014 integrates an annual calendar with moon phases into the Nautilus collection, offering a sophisticated complication within the distinctive case design. This particular reference is notable for its dial color, which provides a distinct aesthetic compared to other annual calendar Nautilus variants. It represents a blend of Patek Philippe's technical prowess in complications and the established design language of the Nautilus line.
This timepiece features a stainless steel case, measuring 40mm in diameter. It is equipped with an automatic movement, visible through a sapphire crystal case back, and protected by a sapphire crystal on the dial side. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 45 hours and incorporates the annual calendar mechanism, which requires only one manual correction per year.
The 5726/1A-014 appeals to collectors seeking a Patek Philippe Nautilus with added functionality beyond a time-only display, yet without the complexity of a perpetual calendar. Its stainless steel construction and specific dial color make it a distinctive option within the broader Nautilus family, offering a balance of utility and refined design.
One of my candidates for "only one watch" collection. That and the new Casio BX5600 Since I love travel watches, this one is close to a perfect watch for me (and nothing will ever be perfect). I know some prefer the thinness of a 5711, but I don't mind at all the extra thickness, for so much extra functionality.
Much better than blue for me. Best, Emmanuel
level of complication, namely the protrusions from the side of the case for the chronograph functions and the travel time element. For me this takes away somewhat from the clean symmetry of the case. This is in contrast to the 5726 which while quite complicated, like the time only 5711 has no protrusions at all. Wondering how you feel about this as a fellow owner of both models? Best, Patekova
got the blue dial and it gets a lot of wrist time. not so much a fan of the 5726, rather prefer my 5712
The pushers for the travel time function don’t bother me at all. I think they are well integrated with the case and don’t impair its symmetry (a really clever solution). The chrono pushers are a different story though. They aren’t bad but I would have preferred the ones of 5980/1A.
Before I saw it in real life for the first time, I was very skeptical because of its thickness (on the paper). But I have learned to appreciate the wrist presence and heft of this model. And, as a matter of fact, I do wear steel models more often than precious metal ones.
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 16 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
