Patek Philippe 5905 vs. A. Lange & Söhne Datograph
Collection

Patek Philippe 5905 vs. A. Lange & Söhne Datograph

By Thomahof · Nov 9, 2019 · 45 replies
Thomahof
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
45 replies9027 views8 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Thomahof initiates a compelling comparison between two high-complication chronographs, the A. Lange & Söhne Datograph and the Patek Philippe 5905. This discussion is particularly relevant for collectors weighing aesthetic preferences against horological prowess and considering the nuances of each brand's approach to complex movements and dial layouts. Thomahof's post highlights the practical considerations of ownership, including pricing dynamics that bring these otherwise distinct pieces into direct competition.

So this combat is a little strange.

Normally you would compare the datograph with the 5270, not the 5905.

But with discounts the datograph is actually not that far apart. At least I think the comparison is realistic. 5270P is out of reach for me, but there's two are in the realm of realism.

The first picture is not my hand, but I feel that the images represent the watch well. The second photo is my hand.

Thomas





About the Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar Chronograph Ref. 5270

The Patek Philippe Grand Complications reference 5270 is a perpetual calendar chronograph, succeeding the highly regarded reference 5970. It represents a significant evolution in Patek Philippe's grand complications lineup, being the first perpetual calendar chronograph to feature an in-house developed movement. This transition from a modified Nouvelle Lemania base caliber to a fully integrated Patek Philippe movement marks a notable advancement in the brand's technical independence and horological prowess. The 5270 maintains the classic aesthetic of its predecessors while introducing subtle design refinements.

The reference 5270 is housed in a 41 mm case, available in 18k white gold, rose gold, or yellow gold. The case design is characterized by a concave bezel and two-tier lugs, contributing to its distinctive profile. It is powered by the manual-winding caliber CH 29-535 PS Q, an integrated chronograph movement with a perpetual calendar mechanism. This movement offers a power reserve of approximately 55 hours and is protected by a sapphire crystal, ensuring water resistance up to 30 meters.

This reference appeals to collectors seeking a modern interpretation of a classic grand complication from Patek Philippe. Its in-house movement and refined case details distinguish it within the brand's offerings. Multiple dial variants have been produced, including silver, blue, and opaline, providing collectors with a range of aesthetic choices. The 5270 continues the tradition of Patek Philippe's perpetual calendar chronographs, offering a blend of technical sophistication and traditional design.

Specifications

Caliber
CH 29-535 PS Q
Case
18k White Gold, Rose Gold, or Yellow Gold
Diameter
41 mm
Dial
Multiple variants available
Water Resist.
30m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
EM
emcquillan
Nov 9, 2019

IMO Dial win Chrono win Perpetual over annual win Movement win in a first round knockout 5270 is a beauty.

TH
Thomahof
Nov 9, 2019

But don't forget the 5905 case. Definitively better than the Lange.

AR
aris d
Nov 9, 2019

I don't like also the chrono register of the 5905. Aris

ZS
ZSHSZ
Nov 9, 2019

The Dato might be a perpetual but all the indications are cramped and hard to read at a glance , vs. the Patek which is “just” an annual calendar but you can easily read everything, and I’m not even mentioning value retention... But all it matters which one makes your hearth beat faster !

TH
Thomahof
Nov 9, 2019

But what about that concave bezel? The value retention? The legibility? And the "Patek" on the dial?

MA
mahesh
Nov 9, 2019

PP is more value safe

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 45 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →