
Thomahof initiates a compelling comparison between two high-complication chronographs, the A. Lange & Söhne Datograph and the Patek Philippe 5905. This discussion is particularly relevant for collectors weighing aesthetic preferences against horological prowess and considering the nuances of each brand's approach to complex movements and dial layouts. Thomahof's post highlights the practical considerations of ownership, including pricing dynamics that bring these otherwise distinct pieces into direct competition.

The Patek Philippe Grand Complications reference 5270 is a perpetual calendar chronograph, succeeding the highly regarded reference 5970. It represents a significant evolution in Patek Philippe's grand complications lineup, being the first perpetual calendar chronograph to feature an in-house developed movement. This transition from a modified Nouvelle Lemania base caliber to a fully integrated Patek Philippe movement marks a notable advancement in the brand's technical independence and horological prowess. The 5270 maintains the classic aesthetic of its predecessors while introducing subtle design refinements.
The reference 5270 is housed in a 41 mm case, available in 18k white gold, rose gold, or yellow gold. The case design is characterized by a concave bezel and two-tier lugs, contributing to its distinctive profile. It is powered by the manual-winding caliber CH 29-535 PS Q, an integrated chronograph movement with a perpetual calendar mechanism. This movement offers a power reserve of approximately 55 hours and is protected by a sapphire crystal, ensuring water resistance up to 30 meters.
This reference appeals to collectors seeking a modern interpretation of a classic grand complication from Patek Philippe. Its in-house movement and refined case details distinguish it within the brand's offerings. Multiple dial variants have been produced, including silver, blue, and opaline, providing collectors with a range of aesthetic choices. The 5270 continues the tradition of Patek Philippe's perpetual calendar chronographs, offering a blend of technical sophistication and traditional design.
IMO Dial win Chrono win Perpetual over annual win Movement win in a first round knockout 5270 is a beauty.
But don't forget the 5905 case. Definitively better than the Lange.
I don't like also the chrono register of the 5905. Aris
The Dato might be a perpetual but all the indications are cramped and hard to read at a glance , vs. the Patek which is “just” an annual calendar but you can easily read everything, and I’m not even mentioning value retention... But all it matters which one makes your hearth beat faster !
But what about that concave bezel? The value retention? The legibility? And the "Patek" on the dial?
PP is more value safe
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 45 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →