
In a compelling analysis, forum member 5980 delves into the highly anticipated Patek Philippe Nautilus Perpetual Calendar, Reference 5740/1G. This article explores 5980's detailed rationale behind Patek Philippe's decision to craft this significant reference in white gold, positioning it as the 'Grand Dame' of the Nautilus line. His insights offer a valuable perspective on the watch's place within the brand's hierarchy and its appeal to collectors.

Patek Philippe Nautilus Travel Time Chronograph Reference 5990
The reference 5990 represents Patek Philippe's combination of travel time and chronograph functions within the Nautilus collection. This stainless steel variant features a blue dial configuration, positioning it as a sports complication piece within the brand's portfolio during its 2014-2018 production period.
The 40.5mm stainless steel case houses the automatic caliber CH 28-520 C FUS movement, delivering 45-55 hours of power reserve. Technical specifications include sapphire crystal protection, 120-meter water resistance, and a smooth bezel design. The watch is completed with a stainless steel bracelet matching the case material.
This reference appeals to collectors seeking dual complications in a steel sports watch format. The blue dial variant offers color distinction within the 5990 series, while the four-year production window establishes its position as a limited-period offering. The combination of travel time and chronograph functions targets users requiring both timing and dual time zone capabilities.
But no WG for me. With time the metal is turning towards dirty yellow and steel would have been much more scratch resistant. Titanium would have been a super solution. Best, Kari
...integrated case specially considering this is 100k+ watch? This Nautilus for me at least becomes a dress watch worn under cuff and not a sports watch worn without. YMMV. For eg. APRO replaceable bezel seems more amenable to use precious metal complications as daily wearers.
Having written that, I wear (and therefore have dinged) all of mine in all metals. Almost 😉. It has never bothered me though I can appreciate why it could. I actually don't find gold any more susceptible than is steel. In fact, to the contrary, which I think in part is due to the additional care / attention I sub-consciously take, which itself I suspect is directly proportionate to the value of the watch 😌. Better said, I think I'm instinctually more cavalier with steel on my wrist. Arguably not
However, I tend to concur with Kari's observations as regards the "metal" chosen. I do understand PP's approach and I expected it to be in G or P but Ti would have made this Nautilus QP even more special. Like you, I'm a huge Nautilus fan and I already thought about 5711R and 5980R with their beautiful brown dial. But I'm not sure what I should think about 5740G. I will see all 2018 novelties at a PP trunk show on 23 April 2018 and I cannot rule out that I will love 5740G but so far I'm a bit he
To drive top line growth instead of increase unit production, PP wants to increase average selling price per unit and hence the metal choice. Recent price rise for 5711/1A is further evidence of this strategy. Unsure if WG margin (%) is also better, they might be targeting improvement in margin also. Rolex clearly wanted to do the same using GMT as an e.g. (WG Pepsi, steel only in Batman), only to back track on that today.
I have a few initial thoughts on this release. With regards to the metal chosen I think it is as you very finely put it, quite suitable. I can see how steel would have been desirable but this is as you say a grande dame. On a sidenote I would have wished the 5650 was in steel as well.... In terms of the complications, it makes great sense to release a perpetual Nautilus. Yes it is a sporty reference but has evolved into an elegant series as well. There are other Nautiluses that offer a more raw
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 26 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →