Patek Philippe 5270G-013 vs. 5270G-014 Comparison
Reference Guide

Patek Philippe 5270G-013 vs. 5270G-014 Comparison

By Mark in Paris · Apr 26, 2015 · 23 replies
Mark in Paris
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
23 replies21873 views10 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Mark in Paris offers a comparative analysis of the Patek Philippe Ref. 5270G-013 (silver dial) and 5270G-014 (blue dial) from 2013, as these versions were replaced at Baselworld 2015. He meticulously details the design differences from the original 2011 5270G and shares his in-person impressions, emphasizing the importance of seeing these perpetual calendar chronographs in the metal.

Gentlemen,

The 5270G-013 (Silver dial) and 5270-014 (blue dial) have been replaced during the Baselworld Fair 2015.

I think it'll be nice to come back to these versions to say good bye.


The late 2013 three new 5270G versions


First version of the 5270G on the left - Late 2013 two new 5270G versions on the right



As you know, the new perpetual calendar chronograph 5270, iconic model of Patek Philippe, was launched in 2011 with a new exclusive and completely in-house movement, the CH 29-535, to replace the legendary 5970 and its Lemania-based caliber.

It was back then available in a unique white gold version with a brushed silver dial and darkened markers and hands.

In late 2013, the brand had launched two new standard versions of the first white gold model with a silvery (5270G-013) and a blue dial (5270G-014).

They were unveiled 2 months after the Munich Watch Art Grand Exhibition held in October 2013 when Patek Philippe presented in the first place the 5270G-015 limited edition (50 pieces).

This limited edition had the same characteristics as the following "013" (Silvery) but with dark blue printings instead of the black ones.




5270G 'Munich'



5270G 'Munich'











The main differences between the first 2011 5270G and the two new iterations, aside from the dial color, were:

 - The applied markers and hands were not darkened anymore;

- Addition of a Tachometer scale, without much reducing the room in the center of the dial;

- Modification of the numerals and scale ring's style in the two subsidiary dials;

- Downsize of the "Patek Philippe, Genève" logo at 12 o'clock.

- Addition of an extension of the tachometer scale at 6 o'clock, following the date subsidiary dial's curve and allowing a more precise reading of the chronograph measures in that area.


I was very curious to see how these two watches looked like and I decided to have a look at them to make my own opinion.

The blue dial choice is a very attractive one when considering other Patek Philippe models in the recent history (5070P, 5200G...). It gives a more casual touch to the watch and can very well match with jeans, summer time clothing or even a grey suit.










The silvery dial is absolutely beautiful, especially when under daylight when it comes to a whiter color.

Furthermore, I wanted to have a look at the tachometer scale curve at 6 o'clock as it was quite an unusual characteristic to say the least.







Well, handled it confirmed (if it has to be) that looking at a watch in the metal is always mandatory compared to pictures viewing experience only.

This is not an exception.

In live, the dial is of course much less magnified than on the material we can see on the internet. Thus, all the details are much smaller and take much less importance in the whole picture.







I was very positively surprised and even said to myself that it looked really good. I must say this new scale is not what comes to your attention at first and it is definitely not the main element you see when you look at the watch.

The date windows, hands and sub-dials are clearly coming in first position and grab your attention. In the end, as I always do to make a global idea of a watch, I asked myself "would I be buying this one if looking for a Patek Philippe Chronograph Perpetual Calendar?": the answer is definitely yes.






I would have chosen the Silvery dial over the Blue one, but this is really a matter of taste of course.

As a conclusion, I wanted to shed a little light over these two versions we didn't talk that much about, excepted at the beginning as the tachometer scale addition at 6 o'clock generated many questions from the watch fans.






I imagine any of these two versions, in ten or twenty years from now, may very well become a great collectible 5270.

I wonder what is your opinion: did some of view had a look at it, or as time goes by, did your opinion evolve on these two specific watches, as I did? Feel free to share your comments!

Cheers,

Mark




This message has been edited by Mark in Paris on 2015-06-24 07:44:41

About the Patek Philippe Ref. 5070

The Patek Philippe reference 5070, part of the Complications collection, marked a significant return for the brand to large-format chronographs. Introduced in 1998, it was the first non-perpetual calendar chronograph produced by Patek Philippe since the reference 1463, which ceased production in the early 1960s. Its design drew inspiration from a unique Patek Philippe aviator's watch from the 1940s, characterized by its prominent case and dial layout, yet reinterpreted for a contemporary audience. This reference established a new aesthetic direction for the brand's chronographs, moving towards more substantial case dimensions.

The watch features a 42mm case, initially offered in 18k yellow gold, housing the manual-winding Caliber CH 27-70. This movement, based on a Nouvelle Lémania ébauche, was extensively finished and modified by Patek Philippe, meeting the brand's stringent quality standards. It provides a power reserve of approximately 55 hours. The dial, in this specific configuration, is black, protected by a sapphire crystal, and the watch is water-resistant to 30 meters. The fixed bezel frames the dial, and the watch is typically fitted with a leather strap.

Reference 5070 appeals to collectors interested in modern Patek Philippe chronographs that combine traditional movement architecture with a more contemporary case size. Its limited production run and the subsequent introduction of variants in other precious metals contribute to its collectibility. The reference represents a distinct period in Patek Philippe's chronograph history, bridging vintage inspirations with a new era of larger watch designs.

Specifications

Caliber
Cal.CH 27-70
Case
18k yellow gold
Diameter
42mm
Dial
black
Water Resist.
30m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
PA
patrickh
Apr 26, 2015

and the pregnant tachymeter scale does not hurt me. Most of men love their "pregnant" woman, isn't it? ;-))) Nice post Mark, Cheers, Patrickh

DR
dr.kol
Apr 26, 2015

I like the new 2015 dial version most. However, based on some comments I received from Patek, I have a funny feeling that 5270 will be replaced with something different in the future. This reference, 5270 has not been too successful and it's possible to find new heavily discounted watches from the market. I will wait till the next version will be released. Best, Kari

WA
watch-er
Apr 26, 2015

That watch really looks big on your wrist. The 5970 seemed to wear a little smaller to me. The 5270 at 39mm would work the best I think.

MA
Mark in Paris
Apr 26, 2015

I think it indeed deserves to be worn :) Cheers, Mark

MA
Mark in Paris
Apr 26, 2015

Well, this 5270 model has known quite a number of evolutions since it was launched. I don't know yet if we can even call this an evolution or just different interpretations... I think that I would have been very pleased with these versions but if I had to choose today I may be following you on that matter even if I may have to consider the 2013 ones have leaf hands whereas the subsidiary dials have thin baton ones in the 2015 version. If there were to be changes, I think it will be in the same 5

MA
Mark in Paris
Apr 26, 2015

and my pictures were taken from quite close. I guess this is why it seems massive to you. When I tried them it didn't look too big to me in this 41 case. The 5970 was 40 x 13 mm if I remember well whereas the 5270 is 41 x 12.5 mm: the proportions would make the 5970 look a little thicker I guess compared to the 5270. Anyway, nothing is better than a live experience to be sure :) Cheers, Mark

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 23 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →