
2006 was a good year for Patek. This year, they unveiled the new World Time, the 5130, the Nautilus 5711 / 5712 / 5980, and the 5960, if my memory serves me well. Among these watches, I got the 5712 and the 5130G. Both left my collection in a normal way, to fund other watches ( 5712 for the 5070G ),
The Patek Philippe reference 5070, part of the Complications collection, marked a significant return for the brand to large-format chronographs. Introduced in 1998, it was the first non-perpetual calendar chronograph produced by Patek Philippe since the reference 1463, which ceased production in the early 1960s. Its design drew inspiration from a unique Patek Philippe aviator's watch from the 1940s, characterized by its prominent case and dial layout, yet reinterpreted for a contemporary audience. This reference established a new aesthetic direction for the brand's chronographs, moving towards more substantial case dimensions.
The watch features a 42mm case, initially offered in 18k yellow gold, housing the manual-winding Caliber CH 27-70. This movement, based on a Nouvelle Lémania ébauche, was extensively finished and modified by Patek Philippe, meeting the brand's stringent quality standards. It provides a power reserve of approximately 55 hours. The dial, in this specific configuration, is black, protected by a sapphire crystal, and the watch is water-resistant to 30 meters. The fixed bezel frames the dial, and the watch is typically fitted with a leather strap.
Reference 5070 appeals to collectors interested in modern Patek Philippe chronographs that combine traditional movement architecture with a more contemporary case size. Its limited production run and the subsequent introduction of variants in other precious metals contribute to its collectibility. The reference represents a distinct period in Patek Philippe's chronograph history, bridging vintage inspirations with a new era of larger watch designs.
And I agree with your preference for the 5110, even though the size of this one suits me better.
I had a 5130P. I did let it go and it was replaced by a 5110J. To be honest, I know you mention the dial proportions as a motivation for you, but that is a personal ttaste issue. I don't find the proportions of the 5130 as a negative. I did find that I preferred tge dial of the 5110 more....with the hands and dial of the 5130 not as much to my taste as I wanted. To be clear, I do prefer the 5110 as a model quite a bit more than the 5130..... but if they had never made the 5110, I think I would b
I just cannot accustom myself to it. And I agree with Nico that the overall balance of decoration of the dial works better with the 5110 size. But for the wrist, I prefer the size of the 5130. And I would agree that if there wasn't a 5110 to compare it to, the 5130 would be completely acceptable.
Baron, you've hit the nail on the head. The proportions of the 5110 seem preferable over the 5130 (and each subsequent iteration) because the 5110 came first and remains the standard bearer. Like many, I have a strong preference for the 5110. While I find it nearly perfect, if I'm honest with myself I'm sure that I would feel the same about the 5130 had the 5110 never been borne. An analogous situation exists with their perpetuals. While I strongly favor the 3940 over the 5140, I'm sure similar
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 14 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →