Patek Philippe World Time 5130G Collector Review
Collection

Patek Philippe World Time 5130G Collector Review

By amanico · Jun 1, 2017 · 14 replies
amanico
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
14 replies3305 views0 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 ✉ 🔗

2006 was a good year for Patek. This year, they unveiled the new World Time, the 5130, the Nautilus 5711 / 5712 / 5980, and the 5960, if my memory serves me well. Among these watches, I got the 5712 and the 5130G. Both left my collection in a normal way, to fund other watches ( 5712 for the 5070G ),

14 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
2006 was a good year for Patek. This year, they unveiled the new World Time, the 5130, the Nautilus 5711 / 5712 / 5980, and the 5960, if my memory serves me well. 

Among these watches, I got the 5712 and the 5130G. 

Both left my collection in a normal way, to fund other watches ( 5712 for the 5070G ), and because the 5110P killed the 5130G. 

Still, a nice watch to consider. Even if I find it less convincing than the 5110P in terms of charm, due to the proportions between the dial and the case and decoration of the dial. I much prefer the guillochĂ© of the 5110. 

Now, those who find the 5110 too small will enjoy the extra 2, 5 millimeters of the 5130. 


Another thing which made me let the 5130 go is that I have some issues owning two watches with the same calibre. Indeed, as you know, the 5110 and the 5130 both share the Cal 240. 

Not that it is a bad movement, by far! But, still, there are some brands I don't want to own two of the same movement. 

So, from the 2006 collection, there is another watch I don't own yet, but which I am more and more considering, the... 5960A. Ok, this version was born some 9 years after, but we'll come back to that one, which is another story...

In the meantime, enjoy the reworked shot. 

Best,

Nicolas





About the Patek Philippe Ref. 5070

The Patek Philippe reference 5070, part of the Complications collection, marked a significant return for the brand to large-format chronographs. Introduced in 1998, it was the first non-perpetual calendar chronograph produced by Patek Philippe since the reference 1463, which ceased production in the early 1960s. Its design drew inspiration from a unique Patek Philippe aviator's watch from the 1940s, characterized by its prominent case and dial layout, yet reinterpreted for a contemporary audience. This reference established a new aesthetic direction for the brand's chronographs, moving towards more substantial case dimensions.

The watch features a 42mm case, initially offered in 18k yellow gold, housing the manual-winding Caliber CH 27-70. This movement, based on a Nouvelle Lémania ébauche, was extensively finished and modified by Patek Philippe, meeting the brand's stringent quality standards. It provides a power reserve of approximately 55 hours. The dial, in this specific configuration, is black, protected by a sapphire crystal, and the watch is water-resistant to 30 meters. The fixed bezel frames the dial, and the watch is typically fitted with a leather strap.

Reference 5070 appeals to collectors interested in modern Patek Philippe chronographs that combine traditional movement architecture with a more contemporary case size. Its limited production run and the subsequent introduction of variants in other precious metals contribute to its collectibility. The reference represents a distinct period in Patek Philippe's chronograph history, bridging vintage inspirations with a new era of larger watch designs.

Specifications

Caliber
Cal.CH 27-70
Case
18k yellow gold
Diameter
42mm
Dial
black
Water Resist.
30m
Crystal
Sapphire
Advertisement
The Discussion
TH
TheMadDruid
Jun 1, 2017
Very nice shot.

And I agree with your preference for the 5110, even though the size of this one suits me better.

BA
Baron - Mr Red
Jun 1, 2017
I didn't do the same...but similar

I had a 5130P. I did let it go and it was replaced by a 5110J. To be honest, I know you mention the dial proportions as a motivation for you, but that is a personal ttaste issue. I don't find the proportions of the 5130 as a negative. I did find that I preferred tge dial of the 5110 more....with the hands and dial of the 5130 not as much to my taste as I wanted. To be clear, I do prefer the 5110 as a model quite a bit more than the 5130..... but if they had never made the 5110, I think I would b

TH
TheMadDruid
Jun 1, 2017
My main objection to the 5130 is the hour hand.

I just cannot accustom myself to it. And I agree with Nico that the overall balance of decoration of the dial works better with the 5110 size. But for the wrist, I prefer the size of the 5130. And I would agree that if there wasn't a 5110 to compare it to, the 5130 would be completely acceptable.

AM
amanico
Jun 1, 2017
The scissor hand is quite nice, though. All this is very subjective. [nt]

AM
amanico
Jun 1, 2017
If the 5110 didn't exist, yes, I would have gone for the 5130 as well! +1. [nt]

SA
sam1234
Jun 1, 2017
Exactly.

Baron, you've hit the nail on the head. The proportions of the 5110 seem preferable over the 5130 (and each subsequent iteration) because the 5110 came first and remains the standard bearer. Like many, I have a strong preference for the 5110. While I find it nearly perfect, if I'm honest with myself I'm sure that I would feel the same about the 5130 had the 5110 never been borne. An analogous situation exists with their perpetuals. While I strongly favor the 3940 over the 5140, I'm sure similar

Available on the marketplace

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 14 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →