
Foversta offers a detailed analysis of the Patek Philippe Calatrava Ref. 5123R, examining its aesthetic ties to historical references like the 2526 and 2573, while also critiquing its mechanical design. The author highlights Patek Philippe's ability to create new watches that feel timeless, but also points out the challenges of integrating a small movement like the 215PS into a larger case. This review provides a critical perspective on how Patek Philippe balances heritage with modern design in its Calatrava line.









The Patek Philippe Reference 2526 is notable as the brand's first serially produced automatic wristwatch. Introduced in 1953, it marked a significant technical advancement for Patek Philippe, housing a self-winding movement at a time when manual-wind mechanisms were still prevalent. This reference is recognized for its clean aesthetic and robust construction, establishing a foundation for future automatic timepieces from the manufacture.
The watch features a 35 mm case, available in 18k yellow gold, 18k rose gold, or platinum. It is powered by the caliber 12-600 AT, an automatic movement with a Gyromax balance and a solid gold rotor, offering a power reserve of approximately 40 hours. The crystal is acrylic, protecting a silver dial that often features enamel. The case design is characterized by its smooth bezel and often includes a screw-down case back, contributing to its water resistance.
For collectors, the Reference 2526 is highly sought after due to its historical significance as Patek Philippe's inaugural automatic model. Variants exist with different dial configurations, including those with applied indexes and small seconds, which can vary between the gold and platinum versions. The presence of original bracelets, particularly on rose gold models, can also add to its collectibility, as these were less common than leather strap configurations.
I very much like the watch; however, I remain uncertain about the abbreviated lugs. Cheers, John
Lugs are a bit strange with this watch: they look small dial side and very long movement side. ;) fx
Have not seen it, but by using my experience with Pateks so far: it will be another unbalanced Patek. To put the 215 in a 38 mm case and trying to make the case look smaller by using a bizzare shape and short lugs does not work for me. The dial will be vast looking. The indices are to long and do not really hide, again, the fact that the watch is simply too big. I found the 5196 also disappointing as it felt already like a plate on the wrist: unbalanced. The only worthy holder of the 215 is the
because the people I know don't want these tiny watches anymore A dresswatch is prefered to be between 40 and 42 mm. Ofcourse I know some people still like or even prefer 35 or 36 mm but they are the minotity, just like only 10 or 15 % will prefer 46 and more Create a poll ( maybe a moderator should make one ... Nicolas ??) and let the people choose between these options 33 mm and smaller 34 - 35 mm 36- 37 mm 38 - 39 mm 40 - 41 mm 42 - 43 mm 44 mm and more I'm pretty sure the majority will vote
And as we are doing a poll anyway: let us also measure the avarage wrist size. Believe me: this is a bow to the American taste, at the moment, suggested by marketing and consulting companies to Patek. I am sure Patek does this reluctantly. The Chinese have all my hopes to rectify this misery, same as we hope they will help us out with the financial mess that we are in. As you can see: who thought about monetary aid comming from China to the West 10 years ago? Same will be with the watch world, I
The bezel, the shape and length of the lugs, the dial colours, the indexes... you know some 36mm watches look as big as 38mm ones. Diameter is only one parameter. Thanks for your comments! Fx
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 33 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →