Patek Philippe 5059R vs 5159R Comparison
Collection

Patek Philippe 5059R vs 5159R Comparison

By Volvok · Mar 18, 2014 · 23 replies
Volvok
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
23 replies20607 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Volvok seeks community advice on a significant first Patek Philippe acquisition, weighing the Patek Philippe 5059R against the 5159R. His post highlights the common dilemma collectors face regarding case size, dial aesthetics, and the balance between classic design and modern preferences.

After many weeks of hesitation I think I need some suggestion from others. Some of my friends(most of them already owns many PPs and collect for over 10 years) said to me that 5059R is the classic PP RETROGRADE with good dial, they think 5159 is too complicated and they don't like the thin elongated Romans number. And they think PP COMPANY just try to follow the market and try to enlarge the size but lost perfect balance do 5059, but they use the same movement. Others said (some of them are AD, friends don't understand much about the watch) I should buy a bigger size(36mm is too small nowadays ) and the 5159R's dial is even more beautiful and delicate. For me, MY wrist is not so big, so 5059R looks ok and good to me, and is cheaper to me!! (Since my friend will sell his 5059R to me which is in very good condition) Can any one give me more advise of these two watch 5059R vs 5159R?! I don't want to be regret after 5-8 years, since it is too small. Thanks for sharing some of your thoughts and maybe some wristshots would be awesome. Jacky






















This message has been edited by Volvok on 2014-03-18 19:12:20

About the Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar Officer Ref. 5159

The Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar Officer Reference 5159 represents the brand's officer-style case interpretation of their perpetual calendar complications. Distinguished by its hinged case back design, the 5159 combines the traditional officer watch aesthetic with one of haute horlogerie's most complex calendar displays. Production commenced in 2006 and continues in the current catalog.

The 38mm case is crafted from 18k white gold with a polished bezel and sapphire crystal. The opaline white dial provides the backdrop for the perpetual calendar indications. Power comes from the manual-winding caliber 215 PS FUS, delivering 44 hours of power reserve. Water resistance is rated to 30 meters, and the watch is fitted with an alligator leather strap.

This reference appeals to collectors seeking Patek Philippe's perpetual calendar complication in the distinctive officer case format. The 38mm sizing and white gold construction position it as a dress watch within the perpetual calendar range. The manual movement and traditional case design attract those favoring classical horological approaches over contemporary interpretations.

Specifications

Caliber
215 PS FUS
Case
18k White Gold
Diameter
38 mm
Dial
Opaline white
Water Resist.
30m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
DA
daytonaman799
Mar 18, 2014

I used to own a 5059. It was my first PP PC. The 36mm case is offset by the 'hamburger' height. The dial is far cleaner and the retrograde date is an AWESOME complication. The 5159 doesn't look as clean. I equate the two to the difference between a rolex day. Date and day date II. The day date II and 5159 seem to be bigger for bigger sake. The day date and 5059 are just classic and appropriately sized. Unless you have massive wrists 36mm for a dressy watch is fine. If I could have kept mine and

AL
alphabeta81
Mar 18, 2014

I do not like the hands or long Romans on the 5159. That said, I prefer the 5050 to both of these by a mile.

JO
jonrus
Mar 18, 2014

In my opinion, for this movement / complication, I like the 5050 > 5059. Not the newer models as stated by others.

BE
bernard cheong
Mar 18, 2014

But I think Patek is a very very careful firm when it comes to meddling. Maybe 5159R is better.

TI
Time to watch
Mar 19, 2014

If its not small on your wrist then go for it. They made the 5159 for people with bigger wrists and lost something in translation. The 5059 is much nicer dial wise in my opinion. Good luck making your decision. Sincerely H.

HA
Hamster07
Mar 19, 2014

I also prefer 5059 to 5159. First I don't have large wrists, so I don't need a bigger version (I don't mind a bigger 5059 though) - the watch just sits perfectly on my wrist. Second, the dial of 5159 is just too busy. The hands, the sunburst dial, the elongated Roman numbers... Each of them has good with its own character, but when they all come together, it's too much for me. In all, I'd still prefer 5059 (even if they cost the same).

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 23 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →