
Patek 5050, to me, is the most understated perpetual calender that bears a similar desirability to Patek 3448 and 3450. The dial design is uncluttered and minimalist for a retrograde perpetual. Its case design is also very simple with no intention to steal any attention from its dial. The dome sapph

The Patek Philippe Reference 3448 is notable as the brand's first self-winding perpetual calendar wristwatch. Introduced in 1962, it marked a significant technical advancement for Patek Philippe, combining the convenience of an automatic movement with the intricate perpetual calendar complication. This reference established a new standard for complicated wristwatches and laid the groundwork for subsequent automatic perpetual calendar models. It was produced for over two decades, demonstrating its enduring appeal and technical success.
The watch features an 18k yellow gold case with a diameter of 37.5 mm, housing the automatic caliber 27-460 Q. This movement provides a power reserve of approximately 40 hours. The dial is champagne in color, protected by a sapphire crystal, and the watch offers a water resistance of 30 meters. The bezel is polished, complementing the overall classic design of the timepiece.
Reference 3448 is highly regarded by collectors for its historical significance as Patek Philippe's inaugural automatic perpetual calendar. It appeals to those who appreciate the blend of traditional watchmaking with technical innovation. The model was primarily produced in yellow gold, with very few examples in white gold, rose gold, or platinum, making those variants particularly rare. Its production run concluded in 1985, solidifying its place as a key reference in the history of complicated Patek Philippe wristwatches.
The watch is very understated and legible, unlike the 3940 type of sub-dials, thus appears uncomplicated. It was first introduced sometime in 1993 after a lapse of many decades (likely 60 years) and at that time only 5016 had the similar feature. Though slight thicker than 3940 because of the robust movement (not micro rotor movement) the watch is very wearable for most occasions. The subsequent introduction of similar versions thru larger cases do not feel the same or reflect the originality, e
there's no competition indeed. Similar to 3940, a legendary classic.
Most relevant to the history of Patek. Also, next to the thickness the piece is also quite heavy, much more substance than a 3940. A beautiful piece, in JG and RG particularly.
5050 is my holy grail and I was able to secure one full set last year. When compared to 3940, which I used to have, it is definitely thicker, due to the full rotor vs micro, central seconds vs no seconds hand, apertures and discs vs subdials. Is this an issue? Not for me! 5050, IMHO, is far more legible than 3940, retrograde date is a superb complications and, at the end of the day, I do really prefer apertures vis a vis subdials. Thanks for your great pic!
There is a no fuss vibe which I really love.
I do like the 3940 very much but I have a slight preference of 5050 because I'm aware that the watch is 'alive' and the automatic rotor is functioning when I see the second hand ticking away.
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 16 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →