
Emmanuel, known as quattro, presents a captivating comparison of three Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar Split Second Chronographs Ref. 5004 from a private collection. This post invites collectors to consider how different precious metals—platinum, white gold, and rose gold—impact the aesthetic and perceived timelessness of this highly coveted reference. His personal preferences spark a lively discussion among enthusiasts about the ultimate choice for such a significant timepiece.
















The Patek Philippe reference 5004 is a highly regarded grand complication, combining a split-seconds chronograph with a perpetual calendar. This reference was a significant offering in Patek Philippe's catalog, representing a sophisticated blend of technical mastery and traditional watchmaking. It was produced in limited numbers, making it a sought-after piece among collectors of complex horology.
The watch features a 36mm platinum case with a thickness of 15mm, housing the manual-winding caliber CHR 27-70 Q. This movement provides a power reserve of 60 hours and is protected by a sapphire crystal. The dial is presented in silver opaline, offering clear legibility for its numerous indications. The case is water-resistant to 30 meters.
As a split-seconds perpetual calendar, the reference 5004 appeals to collectors who value both intricate mechanical solutions and classical design. Its production run from 1996 to 2012 saw various dial and case material iterations, though platinum was a prominent offering. The integration of two major complications in a relatively compact case underscores its appeal within the realm of high-end watch collecting.
Cheers, Emmanuel
All three are heavy hitters of course, it doesn't get any better than this imho (well, the 5370P would be on par for me). Cheers, Pieter
And I agree with you on the 5370P as well. Best, Emmanuel
I'm with you concerning the rare R model! Best, Emmanuel
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 43 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →