Complications
Mech's post captures the excitement of a non-leap year for perpetual calendar owners, showcasing how these intricate complications handle the transition from February 28th to March 1st. Featuring the Patek Philippe 3940G and H. Moser & Cie. Perpetual 1, the article highlights the mechanical ballet of these watches. It offers a glimpse into the technical marvels and personal enjoyment derived from owning such sophisticated timepieces.
Yes a nice challenge for our beloved perpetuals..... The race is on....lets document the non leap leap.... Great duo there ,I still find the Moser one of my fav perpetuals... Mo
Building a QP collection would be as crazy as interesting. Are you trying to do so? Best, Nicolas
should I trust you Nico? :) Mech.
No surprise who won The change starts pretty early with the GO, and it only has to advance two days! Feb 31 on the GO, but the Patek is still being lazy. GO is leaving the 31st behind, and the Patek has finally realized something is happening... All done. Two pokes of the date adjuster for the Patek (with a wooden toothpick, the following morning), and he was going to go til next year. This year, I may race the GO against a different annual
... the date on that Moser. Both pieces are sublime... and I don't mean "below lime". - Scott
...for Moser watches, and have always enjoyed their Perpetual 1. Your photo reminds me again of why I was drawn to the watch in the first place. I love its elegant display. Very nice watches both, and I'm probably in the minority, but I prefer the Moser to the Patek. Thanks for sharing the picture! Cheers, Daos
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 27 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
